Ethical Consideration of Physical Restraint Use in Critically Ill Patients

Journal Title: Journal of Clinical and Medical Research - Year 2019, Vol 1, Issue 2

Abstract

Critically ill patients are unable to provide self-care for themselves and take decisions concerning their own needs, desires, and values due to their illness. Most of critically ill patients show struggling to all health care providers while providing care with verbal and nonverbal communication, loss of memory, restricted movement, and social isolation. Misinterpretation of this role advocacy can lead the nurses’ to undertake unsuitable behavior that result in an ethical dilemma in nursing field [1-7]. Physical restraining removes from the nurses special human qualities of independent feeling for their patients which has a profound impact on the whole process of caring 1 [7-9]. Although the patient is powerless and being controlled irrespective of his/her will, values needs; the patient has the right to autonomy whereas the health care providers have the right to work on the safe environment as well. When performing the physical restraining, nurses are challenged with the ethical conflicts concerned with autonomy and patient safety. Despite this argument, physical restraining is still present in critical care settings [8]. Restraining of patients makes them feel guilty, embarrassed and are not worthy of respect [10-12]. However, all the health care providers’ ethics assert respect for the patient's autonomy and dignity. It can be made better by yielding a trust relationship between health care staff and their patients. The same way, improper and unnecessary use of physical restraints exposes the patients to injury and other potential hazards. Therefore, the critical care nurse takes into consideration when applying to restrain the rule of patient's right to take a decision and avoiding harming [6,10,13-14]. It is mainly the responsibility of the nurses to respect the patient's autonomy but the decision to use physical restraint interrupts the rule of informed consent [13]. It is deduced that nurses and other care providers should search for other choices, predicting the ethical problems that emerge while deciding restraint. In such cases, the main aim for nurses is ensuring patient's safety and maintaining it without interfering with patient's autonomy [2]. However, when a patient look for treatment, it is wise to consider obvious and direct consent when patient/patient's representative can't able to give consent, the health care providers might conduct restraint management in an appropriate situation. Furthermore, the patient's unsafe actions that violated patient might execute unintentionally an ethical issue is very important than anything to protect the care providers and the patient equally. On the other hand, confused but conscious patients are having the knowledge and awareness of restraint and find them uncomfortable. In this situation, the ethical dilemma may evolve as a result of balancing the patient's discomfort vs. unavoidable medical requirements. The health team members usually meet such situation that is ethically arguable as well as psychologically shocking and unacceptable. Even though the reason to apply physical restraining is often to protect the patients from their destructive actions, the studies reveal that restraint is more harmful than beneficial.

Authors and Affiliations

Nahla Shaaban Khalil*

Keywords

Related Articles

Epigenetic Regulation of Breast and Prostate Cancer

Aim: Epigenetic investigates gene expression modifications not due to DNA sequence alterations. Gene expression modifications appear with packing of DNA with variety of chromatine structures. Materials and Methods: Th...

Changes in Visual Parameters in an Adult Amblyope With Vision Therapy

Amblyopia is a common neurodevelopmental visual disorder that results in reduced contrast, motor perception, and excessive crowding along with impaired visual acuity. Literature suggested this disorder can be treated wit...

Malaria and the Sickle Cell Trait: Conferring Selective Protective Advantage to Malaria

Malaria is an endemic disease in the developing countries like Nigeria with high mortality and morbidity rates especially in children and pregnant women who are immune competent. A lot of measures have been taken to cont...

A Report on COVID-19 Variants, COVID19 Vaccines and the Impact of the Variants on the Efficacy of the Vaccines

The Coronavirus pandemic has caused negative effects across the globe; mortality and morbidity being the main impact. After WHO, termed the disease a pandemic in March 2020, they gave in health guidelines to follow to co...

Demonstration of Specific Marker Proteins, Determining Spermatozoa Fertility, and of Proteins, Common for Sperm and Other Cellular Types (Stem/Progenitor, Malignant and Differentiated Normal Cells)

The condensation of nuclear chromatin in mature differentiated male germ cells is an important morphological marker about their fertilization capability or male fertility, respectively. Spermatozoa with decondensed chrom...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP708370
  • DOI https://doi.org/10.37191/Mapsci-2582-4333-1(2)-010
  • Views 100
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Nahla Shaaban Khalil* (2019). Ethical Consideration of Physical Restraint Use in Critically Ill Patients. Journal of Clinical and Medical Research, 1(2), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-708370