Evaluating the coherence of Take-the-best in structured environments
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2012, Vol 7, Issue 4
Abstract
Heuristic decision-making models, like Take-the-best, rely on environmental regularities. They conduct a limited search, and ignore available information, by assuming there is structure in the decision-making environment. Take-the-best relies on at least two regularities: diminishing returns, which says that information found earlier in search is more important than information found later; and correlated information, which says that information found early in search is predictive of information found later. We develop new approaches to determining search orders, and to measuring cue discriminability, that make the reliance of Take-the-best on these regularities clear, and open to manipulation. We then demonstrate, in the well-studied German cities environment, and three new city environments, when and how these regularities support Take-the-best. To do this, we focus not on the accuracy of Take-the-best, as most previous studies have, but on a measure of its coherence as a decision-making process. In particular, we consider whether Take-the-best decisions, based on a single piece of information, can be justified because an exhaustive search for information is unlikely to yield a different decision. Using this measure, we show that when the two environmental regularities are present, the decisions made by limited search are unlikely to have changed after exhaustive search, but that both regularities are often necessary.
Authors and Affiliations
Michael D. Lee and Shunan Zhang
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP677896
- DOI -
- Views 134
- Downloads 0
Prosociality in the economic Dictator Game is associated with less parochialism and greater willingness to vote for intergroup compromise
Is prosociality parochial or universalist? To shed light on this issue, we examine the relationship between the amount of money given to a stranger (giving in an incentivized Dictator Game) and intergroup attitudes and b...
How generalizable is good judgment? A multi-task, multi-benchmark study
Good judgment is often gauged against two gold standards – coherence and correspondence. Judgments are coherent if they demonstrate consistency with the axioms of probability theory or propositional logic. Judgments are...
Image Theory’s counting rule in clinical decision making: Does it describe how clinicians make patient-specific forecasts?
The field of clinical decision making is polarized by two predominate views. One holds that treatment recommendations should conform with guidelines; the other emphasizes clinical expertise in reaching case-specific judg...
Less cognitive conflict does not imply choice of the default option: Commentary on Kieslich and Hilbig (2014)
Kieslich and Hilbig (2014) employ a mouse-tracking technique to measure decision conflict in social dilemmas. They report that defectors exhibit more conflict than do cooperators. They infer that cooperation thus is the...
Effects of distance between initial estimates and advice on advice utilization
Six experiments investigated how the distance between one’s initial opinion and advice relates to advice utilization. Going beyond previous research, we relate advice distance to both relative adjustments and absolute ad...