Actor/observer asymmetry in risky decision making
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2007, Vol 2, Issue 1
Abstract
Are people willing to gamble more for themselves than what they deem reasonable for others? We addressed this question in a simplified computer gambling task in which subjects chose from a set of 10 cards. Subjects selected one card at a time after being instructed that 9 cards were good (win a dollar per card) and one was really bad (lose all the money and end the game). Subjects could stop playing at any time to collect their winnings. Some subjects played the game, others observed a confederate. Both groups took risks beyond what was rational (i.e., 5 cards) but \textit{actors} were riskier than \textit{observers}. The actor/observer asymmetry occurred even after controlling for monetary outcome (i.e., having observers win prizes) and after controlling for how the question was framed (i.e., asking observers what they themselves \textit{would} do as opposed to what the confederate \textit{should} do). We discuss these results in relation to theories of decision making that emphasize separate contributions of rational and experiential systems.
Authors and Affiliations
Diego Fernandez-Duque and Timothy Wifall
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP677563
- DOI -
- Views 142
- Downloads 0
Risky choice in younger versus older adults: Affective context matters
Earlier frameworks have indicated that older adults tend to experience decline in their deliberative decisional capacity, while their affective abilities tend to remain intact (Peters, Hess, Västfjäll, & Auman, 2007). Th...
Trust and self-control: The moderating role of the default
According to recent dual-process theories, interpersonal trust is influenced by both impulsive and deliberative processes. The present research explores the determinants of deliberative trust, investigating how trust dec...
Decisions by coin toss: Inappropriate but fair
In many situations of indeterminacy, where people agree that no decisive arguments favor one alternative to another, they are still strongly opposed to resolving the dilemma by a coin toss. The robustness of this judgmen...
Does moving from war zone change emotions and risk perceptions? A field study of Israeli students
The current field study uses data collected after the 2009 war between Israel and the Hamas militias in the Gaza Strip ended. The study compares recalled emotions and perceived risks among two groups of students, all of...
You don’t want to know what you’re missing: When information about forgone rewards impedes dynamic decision making
When people learn to make decisions from experience, a reasonable intuition is that additional relevant information should improve their performance. In contrast, we find that additional information about foregone reward...