You don’t want to know what you’re missing: When information about forgone rewards impedes dynamic decision making
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2010, Vol 5, Issue 1
Abstract
When people learn to make decisions from experience, a reasonable intuition is that additional relevant information should improve their performance. In contrast, we find that additional information about foregone rewards (i.e., what could have gained at each point by making a different choice) severely hinders participants’ ability to repeatedly make choices that maximize long-term gains. We conclude that foregone reward information accentuates the local superiority of short-term options (e.g., consumption) and consequently biases choice away from productive long-term options (e.g., exercise). These conclusions are consistent with a standard reinforcement-learning mechanism that processes information about experienced and forgone rewards. In contrast to related contributions using delay-of-gratification paradigms, we do not posit separate top-down and emotion-driven systems to explain performance. We find that individual and group data are well characterized by a single reinforcement-learning mechanism that combines information about experienced and foregone rewards.
Authors and Affiliations
A. Ross Otto and Bradley C. Love
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP677716
- DOI -
- Views 128
- Downloads 0
On the generality of the effect of experiencing prior gains and losses on the Iowa Gambling Task: A study on young and old adults
Prospect Theory predicts that people tend to be more risk seeking if their reference point is perceived as a loss and more risk averse when the reference point is perceived as a gain. In line with this prediction, Franke...
On the perception and operationalization of risk perception
We compare and critique two measures of risk perception. We suggest that a single question — “How risky is the situation?” — captures the concept of risk perception more accurately than the multiple-item measure used by...
Domain-specific temporal discounting and temptation
In this investigation, we test whether temporal discounting is domain-specific (i.e., compared to other people, can an individual have a relatively high discount rate for one type of reward but a relatively low discount...
The effects of losses and event splitting on the Allais paradox
The Allais Paradox, or common consequence effect, has been a standard challenge to normative theories of risky choice since its proposal over 60 years ago. However, neither its causes nor the conditions necessary to crea...
Spanish validation of General Decision-Making Style scale: Sex invariance, sex differences and relationships with personality and coping styles.
The General Decision-Making Styles (GDMS) scale measures five decision-making styles: rational, intuitive, dependent, avoidant and spontaneous. GDMS has been related to coping and some personality factors and sex-differe...