Predicting elections: Experts, polls, and fundamentals

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2018, Vol 13, Issue 4

Abstract

This study analyzes the relative accuracy of experts, polls, and the so-called ‘fundamentals’ in predicting the popular vote in the four U.S. presidential elections from 2004 to 2016. Although the majority (62%) of 452 expert forecasts correctly predicted the directional error of polls, the typical expert’s vote share forecast was 7% (of the error) less accurate than a simple polling average from the same day. The results further suggest that experts follow the polls and do not sufficiently harness information incorporated in the fundamentals. Combining expert forecasts and polls with a fundamentals-based reference class forecast reduced the error of experts and polls by 24% and 19%, respectively. The findings demonstrate the benefits of combining forecasts and the effectiveness of taking the outside view for debiasing expert judgment.

Authors and Affiliations

Andreas Graefe

Keywords

Related Articles

Testing transitivity of preferences using linked designs

Three experiments tested if individuals show violations of transitivity in choices between risky gambles in linked designs. The binary gambles varied in the probability to win the higher (better) prize, the value of the...

Processing of recognition information and additional cues: A model-based analysis of choice, confidence, and response time

Research on the processing of recognition information has focused on testing the recognition heuristic (RH). On the aggregate, the noncompensatory use of recognition information postulated by the RH was rejected in sever...

Coming close to the ideal alternative: The concordant-ranks strategy

We present the Concordant-Ranks (CR) strategy that decision makers use to quickly find an alternative that is proximate to an ideal alternative in a multi-attribute decision space. CR implies that decision makers prefer...

Action orientation, consistency and feelings of regret

Previous research has demonstrated that consistency between people's behavior and their dispositions has predictive validity for judgments of regret. Research has also shown that differences in the personality variable o...

Anticipated and experienced emotions in environmental risk perception

Affective forecasting with respect to two environmental risks (ozone depletion, air pollution) was investigated by studying tourists who travelled to either Australia or Bangkok and were thus confronted with one of these...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678365
  • DOI -
  • Views 153
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Andreas Graefe (2018). Predicting elections: Experts, polls, and fundamentals. Judgment and Decision Making, 13(4), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678365