Ambiguity aversion in a delay analogue of the Ellsberg Paradox
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2012, Vol 7, Issue 4
Abstract
Decision makers are often ambiguity averse, preferring options with subjectively known probabilities to options with unknown probabilities. The Ellsberg paradox is the best-known example of this phenomenon. Ambiguity has generally been studied in the domain of risky choice, and many theories of ambiguity aversion deal with ambiguity only in this context. However, ambiguity aversion may occur in other contexts. In the present experiment, we examine the effects of ambiguity in intertemporal choice. Subjects imagine they are expecting a package and must choose between two delivery options. Some delivery times are exact. Others are ambiguous, with delivery possible over a range of dates. This problem was structurally identical to the Ellsberg paradox. Subjects showed the same pattern of responses as in the traditional Ellsberg paradox, with each delivery service preferred when it was the unambiguous option. Ambiguity aversion is not specific to risk, but can also occur in other domains.
Authors and Affiliations
Bethany J. Weber and Wah Pheow Tan
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP677898
- DOI -
- Views 135
- Downloads 0
Perceived time pressure and the Iowa Gambling Task
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of perceived time pressure on a learning-based task called the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). One hundred and sixty-three participants were randomly assigned to o...
Aggregating multiple probability intervals to improve calibration
We apply the principles of the “Wisdom of Crowds (WoC)” to improve the calibration of interval estimates. Previous research has documented the significant impact of the WoC on the accuracy of point estimates but only a f...
On the role of recognition in consumer choice: A model comparison
One prominent model in the realm of memory-based judgments and decisions is the recognition heuristic. Under certain preconditions, it presumes that choices are based on recognition in a one-cue non-compensatory manner a...
“I am uncertain” vs “It is uncertain”. How linguistic markers of the uncertainty source affect uncertainty communication
Two psychological sources of uncertainty bear implications for judgment and decision-making: external uncertainty is seen as stemming from properties of the world, whereas internal uncertainty is seen as stemming from la...
Do minorities like nudges? The role of group norms in attitudes towards behavioral policy
Attitudes of public groups towards behavioral policy interventions (or nudges) can be important for both the policy makers who design and deploy nudges, and to researchers who try to understand when and why some nudges a...