The Sharing Game: Fairness in resource allocation as a function of incentive, gender, and recipient types
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2007, Vol 2, Issue 3
Abstract
Economic games involving allocation of resources have been a useful tool for the study of decision making for both psychologists and economists. In two experiments involving a repeated-trials game over twenty opportunities, undergraduates made choices to distribute resources between themselves and an unseen, passive other either optimally (for themselves) but non-competitively, equally but non-optimally, or least optimally but competitively. Surprisingly, whether participants were told that the anonymous other was another student or a computer did not matter. Using such terms as "game" and "player" in the course of the session was associated with an increased frequency of competitive behavior. Males were more optimal than females: a gender-by-incentive interaction was found in the first experiment. In agreement with prior research, participants whose resources were backed by monetary incentive acted the most optimally. Overall, equality was the modal strategy employed, although it is clear that motivational context affects the allocation of resources.
Authors and Affiliations
Arthur Kennelly and Edmund Fantino
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP677579
- DOI -
- Views 151
- Downloads 0
Others’ opinions count, but not all of them: anchoring to ingroup versus outgroup members’ behavior in charitable giving
Because of the large amount of information and the difficulty in selecting an appropriate recipient in the context of charitable giving, people tend to make extensive use of heuristics, which sometimes leads them to wron...
Prefer a cash slap in your face over credit for halva
We investigated how frequency and amount of punishment affect the decision making of Iranian subjects. In our first experiment, performing a computer-based Persian version of the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), our subjects sc...
Moody experts — How mood and expertise influence judgmental anchoring
Anchoring effects, the assimilation of numerical estimates to previously considered standards, are highly robust. Two studies examined whether mood and expertise jointly moderate the magnitude of anchoring. Previous rese...
Response time and decision making: An experimental study
Response time is used here to interpret choice in decision problems. I first establish that there is a close connection between short response time and choices that are clearly a mistake. I then investigate whether a cor...
How do defendants choose their trial court? Evidence for a heuristic processing account
In jurisdictions with two or more tiers of criminal courts, some defendants can choose the type of trial court to be tried in. This may involve a trade-off between the probability of acquittal/conviction and the estimate...