Evaluating the informativity and specificity of diagnostic criteria for primary screening for acromegaly

Abstract

Background. The most effective method for early diagnosis of any disease, and especially such rare as acromegaly, is considered to be population screening in high-risk groups, the introduction of which in Ukraine requires the development of methodological approaches and economic substantiation. The purpose of the study: based on a comparative analysis, to determine the informativity and specificity of questions that will be included in the questionnaire of primary screening for acromegaly. Materials and methods. The survey was conducted in two groups of people: group 1 — patients with diagnosis of acromegaly verified in the neuroendocrinology center of State Institution “V. Danilevsky Institute for Endocrine Patho­logy Problems of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine” (n = 123); group 2 (n = 550) — persons from the risk group, namely, those who came to an outpatient visit to a general practitioner, therapist, cardiologist, endocrinologist for various reasons and in the presence of somatic and/or endocrine pathology. The evaluation of the obtained data was carried out by the analysis of variance using the software complex SPSS 19.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results. The first set of questions in the developed questionnaire is the evaluation of phenotypic characteristics, that is, the patient’s assessment of changes in his/her appearance. The second set of questions is the determination of complaints by patients that can be a sign of the presence of a pathological process in the central nervous system and pituitary gland. Based on the comparative analysis, in the final version, the questionnaire had 11 questions, which reflect the most significant signs and clinical manifestations of permanent excessive growth hormone. The questionnaire is intended for interviewing individuals at risk in order to carry out opportunistic screening for acromegaly. Conclusions. The proposed method for evaluating the significance of clinical signs of acromegaly allows us to determine with a high degree of pro­bability the final questions for the screening questionnaire.

Authors and Affiliations

O. O. Khyzhnyak, M. R. Mykytyuk, R. S. Nikolaiev, N. Ye. Barabash, K. H. Manska

Keywords

Related Articles

Violations of the System of Lipid Peroxidation in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (Literature Review)

The review presents the data on the current state of the problem of diabetes mellitus type 2 and the role of oxidative stress. Over the last decade, the number of patients with diabetes mellitus has increased by more tha...

Difficulties in the diagnosis and therapeutic approach in autoimmune polyglandular syndrome type 2. A clinical сase

Autoimmune polyglandular syndrome is characteri­zed by an immune-mediated destruction of endocrine tissues. The presence of autoimmune diseases of the endocrine system such as type 1 diabetes mellitus, adrenocortical fai...

Diagnosis and Treatment of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in Pediatric Gynaecology

Diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) in adolescence still raises many questions. The problem is that the characteristics of normal puberty often coincide with PCOS symptoms, so a number of researchers suggest to...

Anemia in Vascular Complications Development Associated with Diabetes Mellitus: Is It a Reason or Consequence?

The patients with cardiorenal anemic syndrome are considered to be the most serious ones with a high cardiorenal risk related to mutual negative impact of severe pathological conditions. The presence of cardiorenal anemi...

Male factor of sterility: algorithm of laboratory diagnosis of the causes (part 2)

Previously, the topics of laboratory diagnosis were covered: assessment of the male androgenic status: what to choose — total or free testosterone; or use an estimated indicator — free testosterone index; what is importa...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP630810
  • DOI 10.22141/2224-0721.15.4.2019.174816
  • Views 83
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

O. O. Khyzhnyak, M. R. Mykytyuk, R. S. Nikolaiev, N. Ye. Barabash, K. H. Manska (2019). Evaluating the informativity and specificity of diagnostic criteria for primary screening for acromegaly. Міжнародний ендокринологічний журнал, 15(4), 304-310. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-630810