EVALUATION OF BREAST MASSES USING MAMMOGRAPHY, SONOGRAPHY AND ITS CORRELATION

Journal Title: Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences - Year 2018, Vol 7, Issue 23

Abstract

BACKGROUND Breast diseases are common in females. In developing countries like India, females are unaware of breast pathologies and are hesitant to reveal, hence they are detected usually in advanced stages. Breast cancer is the most common cause of cancer deaths in women and overall fifth common cause of cancer deaths in the world. Aims and Objectives: To study the specificity of mammography and ultrasonography separately and in combination for detection of breast masses (Ultrasonography-Mammography Correlation); To study the investigations to evaluate various breast masses; To describe suitable indications, advantages and limitations of each technique compared with other available modalities; To study the mimics of breast masses; To have histopathology follow-up and retrospective evaluation with imaging findings to improve diagnostic skills in series of 88 patients complaining of breast mass diagnosed radiologically. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study was a descriptive study, carried out in the Department of Radiodiagnosis, for a period of 1-year extending from October 2016 to October 2017 in female patients complaining of breast mass. A well-informed written consent was obtained from them. Histopathology follow-up was obtained from either biopsy or post-operative tissue. RESULTS Ultrasonography and mammography was done in most of the cases. They were sufficient to diagnose the lesion in most of the cases, especially in benign breast masses. Total 88 patients complaining of breast mass in one or both breasts were examined and evaluated with USG and mammography. The lesions were confirmed on histopathology (FNAC/biopsy). Out of 9 diagnosed malignancies, 1 lesion was missed on mammography and 1 lesion was missed on ultrasonography. One of them was missed on both. For malignancies, specificity of mammography is 93.3% and that of ultrasonography is 86.67%. Combining both the modalities, specificity is near 97%. Out of total 60 abnormal breasts, 6 were missed on USG and 10 were missed on mammography. Combining both the modalities only 2 lesions were missed and were diagnosed on histopathology alone. CONCLUSION Our study confirms the higher combined sensitivity rate for ultrasonography and mammography for detection of breast masses including malignancies. USG is useful in cystic lesions, ectasias, infections, pregnancy-lactation and dense breast evaluation and for image guidance, whereas mammography is useful in detecting microcalcifications, spiculated masses for early detection of malignancies and for stereotactic biopsies. To suggest single modality, ultrasonography is better in younger population and BIRAD 1, 2 and 3 lesions. Whereas, mammography is better in older population and BIRAD 4 and 5 lesions. However, sonomammographic correlation is best in both.

Authors and Affiliations

Ramesh Parate, Vipin Kasat, Rahul Solanke

Keywords

Related Articles

 A PROSPECTIVE STUDY COMPARING STENTING VERSUS NON-STENTING AFTER UNCOMPLICATED URETEROSCOPY FOR URETERIC STONES

 The placement of stents has been a standard practice since 1967. The advantage of routine stenting is that it minimizes postoperative ureteral obstruction and renal colic that may result from ureteral oedema cau...

FRUITFULNESS OF RAJIV GANDHI JIVANDAYI YOJANA TO PATIENTS OF END-STAGE KIDNEY DISEASE TAKING DIALYSIS

BACKGROUND In recent era, incidence of CKD is increasing. Despite of it, very few patients seek Renal Replacement Therapy in India due to very high costs. Recently, Govt. of India has launched Rajiv Gandhi Jivandayi Yoja...

TO STUDY THE SIGNIFICANCE OF HRCT OVER CHEST X- RAY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASES

BACKGROUND Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a heterogeneous group of diffuse parenchymal lung diseases, characterized by restrictive physiology, impaired gas exchange, pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis. Chest radiogr...

PREVALENCE OF TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT DISORDERS EVALUATION OF VARIOUS SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS AND POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTING AETIOLOGICAL FACTORS

BACKGROUND The Temporomandibular Joint Disorders (TMDs) comprise a constellation of symptoms affecting the joint and the muscles involved in jaw movement. The aetiology of TMD is little understood, but has been attribute...

FUSION OF AXIS WITH THIRD CERVICAL VERTEBRA

BACKGROUND During the embryological development if there is any fusion of the contiguous vertebra, it will result in the distraction or failure of normal development. The fusion of the vertebra may be congenital or acqui...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP439404
  • DOI 10.14260/jemds/2018/637
  • Views 48
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ramesh Parate, Vipin Kasat, Rahul Solanke (2018). EVALUATION OF BREAST MASSES USING MAMMOGRAPHY, SONOGRAPHY AND ITS CORRELATION. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 7(23), 2823-2828. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-439404