Evidence in the Israeli criminal process

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to characterize the properties of evidence in the Israeli criminal process and to study the problems associated with the Israeli approach to analyzing evidence. To achieve this goal, such properties of evidence are analyzed: relevance, admissibility, weight, reliability and sufficiency.

Authors and Affiliations

И. В. Глидер

Keywords

Related Articles

The concept of tax mechanism and its elements

The article analyzes the different scientific approaches to the determination of the tax mechanism and its elements. Suggest my own definition of the tax mechanism. Determine the methods of tax planning, tax management a...

On the legal status of higher agricultural enterprises

The article is devoted to the study of the legal status of higher agricultural enterprises. It is constructed by analyzing the legal status of the higher authorities of agricultural enterprises, which fully reflect the s...

On potential jurisdiction of investigative units of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine

The article considers the possibility of introducing investigative units into the structure of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine. The relevance of the full criminal-procedural activity of the State Border Guard S...

The procedure for entry and stay of a Foreign Ukrainian on the territory of Ukraine

The report is devoted to the problems of the procedure for entry and stay of a Foreign Ukrainian on the territory of Ukraine. The procedure of entry and stay of a foreign Ukrainian on the territory of Ukraine is analysed...

On the legal concept of “minimum wage” in modern conditions

Theoretically grounded concept of “minimum wage”, which reflects the differentiated approach to determine its size and refers to the need to ensure a decent standard of living.

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP597795
  • DOI -
  • Views 82
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

И. В. Глидер (2018). Evidence in the Israeli criminal process. Науковий вісник Міжнародного гуманітарного університету. Серія: «Юриспруденція», 32(), 121-124. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-597795