Evolution in Court. A Federal Judge Defines Science
Journal Title: Scientia et Fides - Year 2016, Vol 4, Issue 2
Abstract
This article highlights certain recurring themes in Mariano Artigas’s works by examining a judicial decision made in the United States in 1982 concerning the teaching of “creation-science” alongside “evolution-science” in public schools. These themes include: the proper delimitation of the boundaries of science, the importance of philosophy as a bridge between science and religion, and the misunderstandings concerning the limits of science inherent in scientism.
Authors and Affiliations
Marie George
La possession du degré d’autonomie chez les vivants
The possession of degree of autonomy in living beings In the numerous attempts to define the concept of life, the use of prefixes like “self”, “auto” appears recurrently. This shows the fundamental importance attached t...
Modeling Mystery
The practice of model-building is very common in analytic philosophical theology. Yet many other theologians worry that any attempt to model God must be hubristic and idolatrous. A better understanding of scientific mode...
Mariano Artigas: introducción a su obra publicada
Mariano Artigas: Introduction to his published work The published work of Mariano Artigas (Zaragoza, 1938 – Pamplona, 2006) is extensive and addresses a very wide range of topics. The purpose of this paper is to offer a...
La física cuántica y el diálogo con la religión
Quantum physics and the dialogue with religion The present paper has two main purposes. On the one hand, to introduce Pascual Jordan (1902-1980), an author little known in philosophy academic circles and better known in...
The Interaction of Noetic and Psychosomatic Operations in a Thomist Hylomorphic Anthropology
This article, the second of a two-part essay, outlines a solution to certain tensions in Thomist philosophical anthropology concerning the interaction of the human person’s immaterial intellectual or noetic operations wi...