The Interaction of Noetic and Psychosomatic Operations in a Thomist Hylomorphic Anthropology
Journal Title: Scientia et Fides - Year 2018, Vol 6, Issue 2
Abstract
This article, the second of a two-part essay, outlines a solution to certain tensions in Thomist philosophical anthropology concerning the interaction of the human person’s immaterial intellectual or noetic operations with the psychosomatic sensory operations that are constituted from the formal organization of the nervous system. Continuing with where the first part left off, I argue that Thomists should not be tempted by strong emergentist accounts of mental operations that act directly on the brain, but should maintain, with Aquinas, that noetic operations directly interact with psychosomatic operations. I develop a Thomist account of noetic–psychosomatic interactions that expands upon the first part’s rapprochement between the new mechanist philosophy of neuroscience and psychology and hylomorphic animalism. I argue that noetic–psychosomatic interactions are best understood as analogous to the way diverse higher and lower order psychosomatic powers interact by actualizing, coordinating, and directing the operations of other psychosomatic powers. I draw on James Ross’s arguments for the immateriality of intellectual operations as realizing definite pure functions in order to elucidate the way noetic operations uniquely actualize, coordinate, and direct the psychosomatic operations they interact with. I conclude with a conjectural sketch of how this presentation of Thomist philosophical anthropology understands the noetic and psychosomatic deficits brought about by damage to the nervous system.
Authors and Affiliations
Daniel De Haan
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP489126
- DOI 10.12775/SetF.2018.010
- Views 63
- Downloads 0
Georges Lemaître: la armonía entre ciencia y fe
Georges Lemaître: the harmony between science and faith This article describes the main stages in the life and work of Georges Lemaître, a 20th century catholic priest and mathematical physicist. His two main contributi...
La fiabilidad teórica del determinismo. Un examen desde la propuesta de Mariano Artigas
The theoretical reliability of determinism. A review from the proposal of Mariano Artigas This article has two purposes. The first is to demonstrate that the theory of determinism, which claims to be based on the princi...
Breaking Mariano Artigas’ Frontiers of Evolutionism
I review Mariano Artigas’ appraisal of Evolution as reflected in some of his works. I find that his perception of evolutionary theory changed from a critical attitude, mainly directed against the modern synthesis of the...
Law, Knowledge and Action in Suárez
This paper explores some presuppositions in Francisco Suárez’s theory of law. I intend to show that his doctrine of law can be understood more deeply attending to the role the intellect and the will play in its genesis,...
Pierre Duhem and scientific truth: contextual, partial and real
Mariano Artigas understood scientific truth as real, but at the same time contextual and partial. Artigas shared some research interests and a general outlook with Pierre Duhem. We summarize the evaluation of Duhem’s tho...