Examining the Qur’ānic and Narrative Evidences for the Rule of “Prohibition of Taking Wages for Ritual Obligations”
Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2014, Vol 46, Issue 98
Abstract
Jurisprudence has been originated from the Qur‘ān and ḥadīth and the narrational or ma’thūr jurisprudence has been the first jurisprudential style after the rise of Islam, to such an extent that in the latter periods the expansion of this jurisprudence was intermingled with rational inferences and some issues that enjoyed more widespread aspects were accepted as rules. The rule of prohibition of taking wages for ritual obligations (wājibāt) has been considered as a challenging and controversial rule. This rule in early period of jurisprudence has its roots in some specific-case traditions on judgment, adhān (call to prayer), and instruction of the Qur’an; and in the books of the earlier scholars there is simply a legal judgment (fatwa) on the prohibition of taking wages for preparation of a dead body [for burying]. Differences concerning this issue in the latter periods have been mainly based on and arisen from rational aspects and analyses; and so far the scholars of this field have widely dealt with the rational principles of the rule. However, it has been seriously lacking in addressing the Qur’ānic and narrational aspects of this issue. In this writing, the stipulated and authorized (manṣūṣ) principles of the rule have been gathered from various narrational and exegetical books and put to criticism.
Authors and Affiliations
MajīDriḍā Shaykhī, MuḥSen JahāNgīRī, ‘AbbāS ‘Alī SulṭāNī
Reciprocal duties and rights of owner and usurper after delivering the alternate of usurped property
Alternate of the usurped property is a compensation paid to the owner after unavailability of usurped property. The Iranian Civil Code, following the Islamic scholars' famous view, has principally accepted the payment of...
The Nature of Certitude in Epistemological Terms and the Necessity of Formulating Uṣūlī Material on its Basis
Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law, Tehran University In the methodology of Islamic jurisprudence (‘ilm al-uṣūl), the decisive belief of the religiously accountable (mukallaf) is called certitude (qaṭ‘), which...
Reappraisal of the Nature and Evidences of Waging War (Muḥāriba) in Crimes against Public Order
In Islamic penal law, most of the crimes against national and social security are gathered under the title muḥāriba (waging war); whereas, in jurisprudence, there is disagreement about the nature and criteria of muḥāriba...
Explanation of the theory of “the obligation of breastfeeding by mother and the necessity of paying its related costs by father” from the perspective of Islamic jurisprudence
According to the prevailing view in the Islamic jurisprudence since breastfeeding is not mother's duty, she is entitled to demand wage from her husband for breastfeeding her child. In this article, the authors intend to...
A Critique on the Legal Theory of the Sufficiency of Swearing Fifty Oaths by the Claimant in Qasāma (Compurgation) (The Legal Principles of Article 377 of the Penal Code Bill of 1390 sh/2011)
Qasāma is one of the proofs for homicide, which will be reliable in case of the existence of lawth (strong suspicion). There are two major views on how it is implemented. In sum, the first view deems as necessary swearin...