Examining the Truth and Falsehood from the Viewpoint of Legal Theoreticians
Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2013, Vol 45, Issue 93
Abstract
Nowadays, discussion about and analysis of ṣiḥḥa (truth) and fasād (falsehood) is a focus of attention in theological (uṣūlī) writings. This issue necessitates an explanation of the present structure of the discourse of ṣiḥḥa and fasād in an integrated and logical way. Thereby, to achieve this important task, the present article undertakes a descriptive-analytical research based on a library-method and with a problem-oriented view, and formulates the discourses of ṣiḥḥa and fasād into two fields of conceptology and study of legal decisions and goes on to express and study the viewpoints and arguments of the legal theoreticians (uṣūl scholars) concerning such discourses as: the meaning of ṣiḥḥa and fasād; opposition (taqābul), contradiction (ma‘rūḍ), and variations of ṣiḥḥa and fasād; and also the abstractness, rationality, or fabricatedness of ṣiḥḥa and fasād and the propounded details. Thus, besides unveiling the present logical arrangement of the discourse, it proceeds to indicate the course of development of the discourse, as well.
Authors and Affiliations
‘AbdulkarīM AbdullāHīNizhāD, Sayyid ‘Alī JabbāR GulbāGhī MāSūLa
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP184002
- DOI 10.22067/fiqh.v0i0.11191
- Views 134
- Downloads 0
Legal-Juridical Study of Conditional Option in Unilateral Obligation
In civil law, khiyārāt (options or rights of withdrawal) is a topic concerning contracts. Also, in article 456 of civil law, khiyār is viewed as related to transactions. In statuary jurisprudence and law, there is little...
Examination of the Concept of Ta‘līl (Causal Inference)
What is meant by ta‘līl is that if in a reason the cause of the judgment has been mentioned, the denial of the judgment can been concluded from the lack of that judgment; in such a way that from the denial of restriction...
Analysis of the Legal Nature of Lease Documents
Among the important discourses in financial law are the issues related to financial institutions. Going through these issues are of considerable significance in Islamic law since the lawmaker prohibits specific types of...
A Critique of the Theory “Reconciliation between Muftaraqāt and Differentiation between Mujtama‘āt”
In Sunnī and Imāmī jurisprudence, some have said that the legal base in devising rulings is founded on “differentiation between similarities (mutimāthilāt)” and “reconciliation between differences (mutafarriqāt)” and in...
The Issue of Khums: Acquired Benefits or Benefits in General
The extent of “benefits”, as the subject of khums, is one of the controversial discourses among the Imāmī jurists, which is of great importance because of its applicability. The “acquired benefits” and “benefits in gener...