Exploring alternatives to antibiotics as health promoting agents in poultry- a review

Journal Title: Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences - Year 2016, Vol 4, Issue 3

Abstract

Poultry industry has undergone rapid growth during last three decades. For which even higher usage of antibiotics, both as growth promoters as well as therapeutic agents, has been adopted. However, due to the fear of resistance development in bacterial populations to antibiotics, presence of antibiotic residues in poultry products and increasing consumer demand for products free from antibiotic residues, search for alternatives that could replace antibiotics without causing loss to productivity or product quality has accelerated. Such alternatives in poultry include the use of organic acids, probiotic microorganisms, prebiotic substrates that benefit proliferation of beneficial bacterial populations or synbiotic (combinations of prebiotics and probiotics) ensuring better production and maintaining health of the birds. Others include vitamins and minerals, herbal drugs, plant extracts, phytobiotics and antimicrobial peptides. Probiotic organisms provides competition to pathogenic organisms for intestinal colonizing sites, reduce the diversion of nutrients for harmful microbes and the toxins produced by them and stimulates the immune systems. Similarly, prebiotic offers an alternative, as it alters the intestinal microbes and immune system to reduce colonization by pathogens and allows proliferation of beneficial microflora in the gut. Even using synbiotic is a better strategy for enhancing poultry production, however, more research is needed for selection of probiotic, prebiotics or synbiotics either alone or in combination that can result in the selection of strains capable of performing effectively in the gastrointestinal tract. The contents of this review will be useful for researchers to enrich their knowledge on alternatives of antibiotics in poultry birds without compromising performance of birds and bird welfare.

Authors and Affiliations

Ajit Singh Yadav, Gautham Kolluri, Marappan Gopi, Kumaragurubaran Karthik, Yashpal Singh Malik

Keywords

Related Articles

PESTICIDAL REPERCUSSIONS OF DIFFERENT PLANTS OIL ON LARVAE AND ADULT of Tribolium confusum JAQUELIN DU VAL

Continues use of synthetic insecticides has resulted in resistance towards insecticides. Therefore, present study was conducted to evaluate the biocontrol potential of three essential oil fumigation viz., Zea mays, Zingi...

ENTERIC VIRAL ZOONOSES: COUNTERACTING THROUGH ONE HEALTH APPROACH

Zoonotic viruses own a strong capability of transmission from animals to human or vice-versa, making them more resilient to quick modifications in their genetic sequences. This provides the advantage to adapt the new cha...

Nutritive evaluation of azolla as livestock feed

Present study was undertaken to explore the nutritive potential of Azolla pinnata as an animal feed. For this Azolla was cultivated in water trough, harvested and sundried. Sundried Azolla sample was analysed for proxima...

Microsporogenesis manipulation by CHA’s to eliminate emasculation in hybrid seed production of okra (Albemoschus esculemtum L.)

Present study was conducted to identify effective microsporogeneis and flower bud stage for application of male gametocides to induce pollen sterility in okra. Results of study revealed the association of floral bud size...

Menstrual syndrome: severity, frequency and symptomatology in adolescent girls of Quetta, Pakistan

The purpose of the study was to investigate the prevalence of menstrual characteristics, its frequency, age of menarche, symptomatology and factors associated with menstrual cycle. A total of 450respondentswere studied i...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP428149
  • DOI 10.18006/2016.4(3S).368.383
  • Views 107
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ajit Singh Yadav, Gautham Kolluri, Marappan Gopi, Kumaragurubaran Karthik, Yashpal Singh Malik (2016). Exploring alternatives to antibiotics as health promoting agents in poultry- a review. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences, 4(3), 368-383. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-428149