Extraction vs. non-extraction decision based on facial profile

Journal Title: IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) - Year 2017, Vol 16, Issue 10

Abstract

Introduction: Facial appearance plays an important role when planning orthodontic treatment. The major issue involved in the extraction vs. non-extraction decision is its effect on the soft-tissue profile. The objective of this cross-sectional study was to determine the ratio between extraction and non-extraction treatment protocols. More over whether such decisions were based on soft tissue profile or severe arch length discrepancy in border line case at Department of Orthodontics, University Dental Clinical Centre "St. Pantelejmon" - Skopje, Macedonia. Material and Methods: One hundred and fifteen patients were randomly selected from the diagnostic database fulfilling the inclusion criteria. These records included history, lateral cephalogram and casts for each patient. Results: 39.1% of the total sample was treated with extraction protocol where as 60.9% was treated nonextraction. Out of total extraction cases, 69.8% extraction decisions were carried out on the basis of profile and 30.2% on arch length discrepancy as a predominant factor. Profile based distribution of the sample were; 55.5% convex, 43.5% straight and 1% with concave profiles. Conclusion: Most of the patients having convex and straight profile and more than half of the extraction decisions were based on profile. Arch length discrepancy was the second most important decision influencing extraction protocol decision. A borderline case with pre-treatment lip protrusion may be better served with extraction. Hence in accordance to the „soft tissue paradigm‟ such a decision during the treatment planning should be paramount in making treatment decisions. Profile based treatment planning leads to better treatment results.

Authors and Affiliations

Ivan Tanatarec, Gabriela Kjurchieva- Chuchkova, Evdokija Jankulovska, Elena Petrova, Biljana Petrovska, Vesna Jankulovska

Keywords

Related Articles

The Effect of Intravenous Magnesium Therapy on Spinalanaesthesia Produced by Bupivacaine In Pre-Eclamptic Patients

Background:Magnesium has anti-nociceptive effects and potentiates opioid analgesia following its systemic and neuraxial administration. In our study, the effect of intravenous magnesium sulphate in pre-eclamptic patients...

Comparison Of Stress Response During Direct Laryngoscopic Versus Fibreoptic Orotracheal Intubation Following Premedication With Dexmedetomidine.

Introduction Laryngoscopy and intubation is known to cause a significant stress response elicited as sympathetic overactivity. This may be seen as an elevation in heart rate, blood pressure, and catecholamine levels in b...

Tofacitinib- A First-In-Class Drug for Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, systemic and disabling autoimmune inflammatory disease characterized by inflammation of the synovial lining of the joints, tendons and periarticular structure affecting approximate...

Microorganisms Isolated from Port Site Infection: AclinicoMicrobiological Study

Background: Port-site infection (PSI) is a prevailing, chronic, nagging, treatment refractory complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomies. It neutralizes the advantages of minimally invasive surgery and increases morb...

Role of Oxidative Stress in COPD. Can we Use A Novel Biomarker To Measure It?

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a common, preventable disease characterized by persistent respiratory symptoms and airway narrowing. It has been predicted by the WHO to become the 3rd leading cause of dea...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP243560
  • DOI 10.9790/0853-1610044044
  • Views 66
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ivan Tanatarec, Gabriela Kjurchieva- Chuchkova, Evdokija Jankulovska, Elena Petrova, Biljana Petrovska, Vesna Jankulovska (2017). Extraction vs. non-extraction decision based on facial profile. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS), 16(10), 40-44. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-243560