Extraction vs. non-extraction decision based on facial profile

Journal Title: IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) - Year 2017, Vol 16, Issue 10

Abstract

Introduction: Facial appearance plays an important role when planning orthodontic treatment. The major issue involved in the extraction vs. non-extraction decision is its effect on the soft-tissue profile. The objective of this cross-sectional study was to determine the ratio between extraction and non-extraction treatment protocols. More over whether such decisions were based on soft tissue profile or severe arch length discrepancy in border line case at Department of Orthodontics, University Dental Clinical Centre "St. Pantelejmon" - Skopje, Macedonia. Material and Methods: One hundred and fifteen patients were randomly selected from the diagnostic database fulfilling the inclusion criteria. These records included history, lateral cephalogram and casts for each patient. Results: 39.1% of the total sample was treated with extraction protocol where as 60.9% was treated nonextraction. Out of total extraction cases, 69.8% extraction decisions were carried out on the basis of profile and 30.2% on arch length discrepancy as a predominant factor. Profile based distribution of the sample were; 55.5% convex, 43.5% straight and 1% with concave profiles. Conclusion: Most of the patients having convex and straight profile and more than half of the extraction decisions were based on profile. Arch length discrepancy was the second most important decision influencing extraction protocol decision. A borderline case with pre-treatment lip protrusion may be better served with extraction. Hence in accordance to the „soft tissue paradigm‟ such a decision during the treatment planning should be paramount in making treatment decisions. Profile based treatment planning leads to better treatment results.

Authors and Affiliations

Ivan Tanatarec, Gabriela Kjurchieva- Chuchkova, Evdokija Jankulovska, Elena Petrova, Biljana Petrovska, Vesna Jankulovska

Keywords

Related Articles

Mode of delivery and perinatal outcome in oligohydramnios

To assess the association of adverse perinatal outcome in cases with oligo hydramnios diagnosed antepartum. The results are compared with perinatal outcome of controls with Amniotic fluid index (AFI) 8-18 cms. The study...

Comparison of Dexmedetomidine And Fentanyl As Adjuvant for Wound Infiltration To Bupivacaine for Postoperative Pain Relief After Abdominal Hysterectomy

Introduction: Several methods have been proposed to alleviate pain after hysterectomy. Local infiltration of the surgical wound is one of the important components of multimodal analgesia for post-operative pain relief. T...

Editorial office panel IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JD

Objective: Tinnitus is a very common complaint and affects 7% of population and has been associated with a range of physical and emotional disorders. There are several modalities of treating tinnitus, but with doubtful r...

Antimycobacterial Activity of Benzylidene Acetone Analogues on Curcumin Against Resistant And Sensitive Mycobacterium Tuberculosis

Curcumin is a compound possessing many pharmacological activities, but it has bad bioavailability and stability. Therefore modification should be conducted in curcumin structure. One of the results of curcumin analog mod...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP243560
  • DOI 10.9790/0853-1610044044
  • Views 43
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ivan Tanatarec, Gabriela Kjurchieva- Chuchkova, Evdokija Jankulovska, Elena Petrova, Biljana Petrovska, Vesna Jankulovska (2017). Extraction vs. non-extraction decision based on facial profile. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS), 16(10), 40-44. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-243560