FACT FINDING, WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE & REASONABLE DOUBT IN CIVIL & CRIMINAL TRIALS

Abstract

“It is known maxim of law that it is better to acquit a guilty person than punish an innocent one”. How does law support and help to achieve this maxim is to be examined through civil and criminal trials’ procedures and announcement of judgments by the courts. To give a final verdict any trial has to find the facts of the case and then apply Law to the same. But facts may have other circumstances that can drastically change the potential reasons for that fact to take place. To sieve through the facts and reasons Law demands from litigants to present the evidence (documentary or witnesses) to the judge. Objective justice can only be achieved when a court system admits only most relevant and trustworthy evidence. The burden of producing evidence is on party what they allege or deny. But Guilt or innocence needs to be established without any doubt to fully practice the maxim quoted above. This article seeks to examine the burden to bring evidence placed on parties in adversarial and inquisitorial legal systems and concept of “reasonable doubt” in the evidences which can change the course of a trial and hence bring unexpected judgment. The article also seeks to highlight common factors in Islamic Law and common law principles regarding proof and reasonable doubt.

Authors and Affiliations

MISBAH SABOOHI

Keywords

Related Articles

Assessment of the Role of Egypt’s 2015 Parliament in Promoting Democracy and Good Governance

Democracy and good governance are no longer a luxury; however, they are essential for sustainable development. Parliaments are the imperative foundations of democracy and good governance. Authorities and functions of par...

STUDENTSHIP IN THE TERTIARY INSTITUTIONS

Education can be seen as the process of enabling one to develop his potentials and modify behaviors in order to live and contribute effectively to the society. It was observed that education opens one’s eyes to the path...

Carltona Doctrine in Administrative Law

In the Administrative Law of England the Carltona Doctrine is basically concerned with the principle governing the relationship between a Minister and his Civil Servant, and the legal validity of the action taken by a Ci...

Entrepreneurship and Creative Partnership of Heritage Management in National Medicine Patent Development: A Contribution to Current Issue of Public Health

The statistical data of Indonesian Law and Human Rights Ministry shows an unfortunate irony: the number of domestic patents registration in 2016 was quite low, with only 1.440 patent registrations comparing to 7.766 fore...

The US Democracy Promotion in the Middle East, A Materialistic Approach: Actions versus Rhetoric

According to the democratic peace proposition, democratic states should promote democracy in non-democratic states not only as a value but also as a genuine interest. During the last two decades, the G. W. Bush and Obama...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP222192
  • DOI -
  • Views 93
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

MISBAH SABOOHI (2017). FACT FINDING, WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE & REASONABLE DOUBT IN CIVIL & CRIMINAL TRIALS. International Journal of Political Science, Law and International Relations (IJPSLIR), 7(1), 11-26. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-222192