Fallacious argumentation in student reasoning: Are there benefits?

Journal Title: European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education - Year 2014, Vol 2, Issue 1

Abstract

This article reports on an analysis of episodes of invalid or controversial arguments that occurred while two different groups of students worked on similar fraction tasks and examine the role that these types of arguments played in the development of students' reasoning. One group consisted of suburban, middle-class, fourth graders who worked on these tasks during the regular school day. The other group was comprised of sixth-graders from an urban community working on similar tasks as part of an informal learning after-school project. The findings of this study indicate that allowing students to share and discuss incorrect arguments promoted rich mathematical discourse and argumentation. The invalid arguments triggered the use of varied reasoning by other students and cleared up previous [mis]understandings.

Authors and Affiliations

Mary Mueller| Educational Studies, Seton Hall University, South Orange , USA, For correspondence: muellermf@shu.edu, Dina Yankelewitz *| Childhood Education, Mercy College, Dobbs Ferry, USA

Keywords

Related Articles

Secondary students’ attitudes to animal research: examining the potential of a resource to communicate the scientist’s perspective

A DVD resource that provided a scientist’s perspective on the use of animals in research and teaching was evaluated with a questionnaire that asked students’ views pre and post their access to the resource. Thirty-nine s...

Proof construction and evaluation practices of prospective mathematics educators

This study was conducted with 93 freshmen and 82 senior prospective mathematicians and mathematics teachers in order to investigate how they construct and evaluate proofs and whether there are any significant differences...

Integrating ICTs into the environmental science primary school classroom in Chegutu district, Zimbabwe: problems and solutions

This study investigated primary school teachers’ perceptions of the barriers and challenges preventing them from integrating ICTs in the environmental science classroom. The study adopted a qualitative research approach...

Characteristics of teachers’ support on learning: a case study

One of the problems in science education research is obtaining evidence that particular teacher support of learning helps achieve better academic results for students. Classroom ecology involves many variables that are d...

An investigation into students’ difficulties in numerical problem solving questions in high school biology using a numeracy framework

The ‘mathematics problem’ is a well-known source of difficulty for students attempting numerical problem solving questions in the context of science education. This paper illuminates this problem from a biology education...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP8031
  • DOI -
  • Views 379
  • Downloads 27

How To Cite

Mary Mueller, Dina Yankelewitz * (2014). Fallacious argumentation in student reasoning: Are there benefits?. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(1), 27-38. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-8031