Fallacious argumentation in student reasoning: Are there benefits?

Journal Title: European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education - Year 2014, Vol 2, Issue 1

Abstract

This article reports on an analysis of episodes of invalid or controversial arguments that occurred while two different groups of students worked on similar fraction tasks and examine the role that these types of arguments played in the development of students' reasoning. One group consisted of suburban, middle-class, fourth graders who worked on these tasks during the regular school day. The other group was comprised of sixth-graders from an urban community working on similar tasks as part of an informal learning after-school project. The findings of this study indicate that allowing students to share and discuss incorrect arguments promoted rich mathematical discourse and argumentation. The invalid arguments triggered the use of varied reasoning by other students and cleared up previous [mis]understandings.

Authors and Affiliations

Mary Mueller| Educational Studies, Seton Hall University, South Orange , USA, For correspondence: muellermf@shu.edu, Dina Yankelewitz *| Childhood Education, Mercy College, Dobbs Ferry, USA

Keywords

Related Articles

Scientific skateboarding and mathematical music: edutainment that actively engages middle school students

Edutainment has recently been a major growing area of education, showing great promise to motivate students with relevant activities. The authors are among innovators who have developed cutting-edge fusions of popular c...

Light pollution in natural science textbooks in Spanish secondary education

Light pollution has emerged with the industrial development in recent decades. It is becoming a significant environmental issue for cities today and it will probably become more important in the near future. However, ver...

Primary school teachers’ interviews regarding Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) and General Pedagogical Knowledge (GPK)

Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) and General Pedagogical Knowledge (GPK) are fundamental types of knowledge for a teacher that he or she must use in order to plan, teach in the classroom, and assess students’ learnin...

Can Grade-6 students understand quarks? Probing acceptance of the subatomic structure of matter with 12-year-olds

This study introduces a teaching concept based on the Standard Model of particle physics. It comprises two consecutive chapters – elementary particles and fundamental interactions. The rationale of this concept is that t...

Does every cell get blood? young students’ discussions about illustrations of human blood circulation

This article presents a study of how groups of young students discuss illustrations of human blood circulation. Transparency is not an innate quality of illustrations, visual information is always coded and interpretatio...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP8031
  • DOI -
  • Views 461
  • Downloads 27

How To Cite

Mary Mueller, Dina Yankelewitz * (2014). Fallacious argumentation in student reasoning: Are there benefits?. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(1), 27-38. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-8031