Fallacious argumentation in student reasoning: Are there benefits?

Journal Title: European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education - Year 2014, Vol 2, Issue 1

Abstract

This article reports on an analysis of episodes of invalid or controversial arguments that occurred while two different groups of students worked on similar fraction tasks and examine the role that these types of arguments played in the development of students' reasoning. One group consisted of suburban, middle-class, fourth graders who worked on these tasks during the regular school day. The other group was comprised of sixth-graders from an urban community working on similar tasks as part of an informal learning after-school project. The findings of this study indicate that allowing students to share and discuss incorrect arguments promoted rich mathematical discourse and argumentation. The invalid arguments triggered the use of varied reasoning by other students and cleared up previous [mis]understandings.

Authors and Affiliations

Mary Mueller| Educational Studies, Seton Hall University, South Orange , USA, For correspondence: muellermf@shu.edu, Dina Yankelewitz *| Childhood Education, Mercy College, Dobbs Ferry, USA

Keywords

Related Articles

Music activities as a meaningful context for teaching elementary students mathematics: a quasi-experiment time series design with random assigned control group

The purpose of the current research was to examine the effects of a sequence of classroom activities that integrated mathematics content with music elements aimed atproviding teachers an alternative approach for teaching...

An investigation into students’ difficulties in numerical problem solving questions in high school biology using a numeracy framework

The ‘mathematics problem’ is a well-known source of difficulty for students attempting numerical problem solving questions in the context of science education. This paper illuminates this problem from a biology education...

Arterial tonometry in the classroom

The study of hemodynamic physiology utilizing traditional methods presents many challenges and limitations to educators. The goal of the educator is to provide the student with an adequate understanding of the basic hemo...

Conceptions of pupils of the primary on the topic of an electric circuit in three countries (Canada, France and Morocco)

Qualitative research conducted with 237 pupils from Canada, France, and Morocco, between 10 and 12 years of age, on the setting and functioning of simple electric circuits, demonstrates that similar explanatory systems o...

Does representation matter? Teacher-provided tables and drawings as cognitive tools for solving non-routine word problems in primary school

According to the German educational standards, students should be familiar with problem-solving as a general mathematical competency by the end of grade 4. Non-routine word problems are suitable tasks for mathematical pr...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP8031
  • DOI -
  • Views 453
  • Downloads 27

How To Cite

Mary Mueller, Dina Yankelewitz * (2014). Fallacious argumentation in student reasoning: Are there benefits?. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(1), 27-38. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-8031