Fallacious argumentation in student reasoning: Are there benefits?

Journal Title: European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education - Year 2014, Vol 2, Issue 1

Abstract

This article reports on an analysis of episodes of invalid or controversial arguments that occurred while two different groups of students worked on similar fraction tasks and examine the role that these types of arguments played in the development of students' reasoning. One group consisted of suburban, middle-class, fourth graders who worked on these tasks during the regular school day. The other group was comprised of sixth-graders from an urban community working on similar tasks as part of an informal learning after-school project. The findings of this study indicate that allowing students to share and discuss incorrect arguments promoted rich mathematical discourse and argumentation. The invalid arguments triggered the use of varied reasoning by other students and cleared up previous [mis]understandings.

Authors and Affiliations

Mary Mueller| Educational Studies, Seton Hall University, South Orange , USA, For correspondence: muellermf@shu.edu, Dina Yankelewitz *| Childhood Education, Mercy College, Dobbs Ferry, USA

Keywords

Related Articles

Instruction strategies work out by mathematics teachers: evaluating the affect on bachelor of education

The main objective of this research is to study the different instruction strategies implemented by Mathematics teachers and evaluating its affect on Bachelor of Education (B.Ed) level. To complete the study, two samples...

Deepening prospective mathematics teachers’ diagnostic judgments: Interplay of videos, focus questions, and didactic categories

This study aims to describe how energy subject is taught in 9th grades. The study is designed as a descriptive case study with the participation of 3 physics teachers and 85 students. Data were obtained through observati...

Music activities as a meaningful context for teaching elementary students mathematics: a quasi-experiment time series design with random assigned control group

The purpose of the current research was to examine the effects of a sequence of classroom activities that integrated mathematics content with music elements aimed atproviding teachers an alternative approach for teaching...

Conceptions of pupils of the primary on the topic of an electric circuit in three countries (Canada, France and Morocco)

Qualitative research conducted with 237 pupils from Canada, France, and Morocco, between 10 and 12 years of age, on the setting and functioning of simple electric circuits, demonstrates that similar explanatory systems o...

YASS: A system simulator for operating system and computer architecture teaching and learning

A highly interactive, integrated and multi?level simulator has been developed specifically to support both the teachers and the learners of modern computer technologies at undergraduate level. The simulator provides a hi...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP8031
  • DOI -
  • Views 413
  • Downloads 27

How To Cite

Mary Mueller, Dina Yankelewitz * (2014). Fallacious argumentation in student reasoning: Are there benefits?. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(1), 27-38. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-8031