Family doctors role in the early diagnosis of lung cancers

Journal Title: Przewodnik Lekarza - Year 2005, Vol 80, Issue 8

Abstract

An increase in the incidence of lung cancer has decided about the image of malignant neoplasm in all developed countries in XX century. The development and death rate caused by malignant lung tumour among about 65-year-old patients has recently reached the highest, never-recorded level in Poland. The diagnosis of lung cancer does not necessarily mean a patient’s death as the fate of a person who suffers from lung cancer depends on proper diagnosis made during the first appointment usually with the family doctor. Neglecting or underestimating the symptoms reported by patients or their families means huge delay in taking a decission to have proprer tests. As a result it is too late to start effective treatment after the diagnosis has already been taken. Each family doctor deals with 3-10 new neoplasm casualties every year. Statistics indicate that 30% of patients lose approximately 4.5 months as a result of wrong medical tests and diagnosis. In such situations it is adviseable to omit “indirect levels”, where the ill can be subjected to uneffective attempts of observation or treatment without having undregone particular and deliberate examinations. Repeating and illogical expanding of further medical tests that do not contribute any significant factors to the diagnosis not only prolongs the observation period and worsens the patient’s chances to recover but also increases the expenses. Professional diagnosis of cancerous disease should be made only on the basis of co-operation of family doctors, clinicians, radiologists and pathomorphologists. Lung cancer shows high heterogeneity, as only 30-40% of this kind of cancer show texture of only one histological type. From practical point of view while considering the choice of treatment method, the most important thing is to distinguish microcellural (inoperable) cancer from the other types of cancer. Among the possibilities of prevention from the growth and development of lung cancer, whose the forefront is taken by the primary prevention, is the elimination of smoking which is responsible for the growth of 80-90% of all cases affected by this sort of tumour. These are family doctors who take responsibility for the level and results of oncological treatment that are reached by a certain country

Authors and Affiliations

Hanna Romatowska-Dziób, Bogumił Kiss

Keywords

Related Articles

Zaburzenia krążenia mózgowego

Zaburzenia krążenia mózgowego, a zwłaszcza udar niedokrwienny mózgu, stanowią istotny problem kliniczny i społeczny. Są one spowodowane przez wiele czynników, z których najczęstszymi są miażdżyca tętnic i nadciśnienie...

Angiotensin II antagonists in heart failure - current recommendations

Current guidelines of European Society of Cardiology on treatment of heart failure with the use of angiotensin II receptor antagonists are presented in this article.

Czynniki ryzyka zdarzeń sercowo-naczyniowych w populacji pacjentów podstawowej opieki zdrowotnej

Praca przedstawia dane epidemiologiczne w zakresie wyników programu oceny Standardu podstawowej opieki kardiologicznej (POLKARD-SPOK), który jest realizowany w ramach Narodowego programu profilaktyki i leczenia chorób uk...

Social idea of rationalization of people with movement organs disfunction

In Poland such as in other countries we can see that the number of disability people is growing. Disabilition is a particular social problem. Essential factor which assigns its rank is a number of this people. Today it...

Podstawy fizjologii układu limfatycznego. Obrzęk chłonny

Układ chłonny pełni istotną rolę w organizmie. Procesy patologiczne w jego obrębie prowadzą do powstania obrzęku chłonnego. Pomimo że ten problem dotyczy dużej liczby pacjentów, jest często bagatelizowany i niedocenian...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP139076
  • DOI -
  • Views 86
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Hanna Romatowska-Dziób, Bogumił Kiss (2005). Family doctors role in the early diagnosis of lung cancers. Przewodnik Lekarza, 80(8), 70-74. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-139076