Formation of the comparative history of law as a scientific and educational discipline in the second half of XVIII – the first third of XIX centuries

Abstract

Considered is the formation of the comparative history of law in the context of the general positive teaching on law differentiation idea in the second half of XVIII – the first third of the XIX centuries. The author argues that the first conceptualization of comparative (general) history of law is still unknown, but the impetus for its design was the Thibault’s requirement for the history of law expressed in 1814: it becomes a science only if cover the histories of all peoples. But it could be argued that comparative history of law had been gradually distinguished in the general history frame that took on political and legal character. The comparative history of law was formed, got its name and recognition as an independent educational discipline in German universities since 1818 through the efforts of S. Brendel, J.P. von Hornthal and other professors, and later – in the Paris College de France, and soon was conceptualized in Gans and Lerminier works. They defined it primarily as a separate legal (as well as comparative and historical) science, emerging at the history of law, philosophy of law, comparative jurisprudence intersection, has to obtain and synthesize, primarily based on comparative and chronological analysis, knowledge on the history and current state of law and legal thought of different peoples, which is the basis for the development and refinement of concepts, essence of legal phenomena cognition. The principal provisions of comparative history of law creators was the freedom of this science of utilitarian purposes, its focus on pure knowledge and the general teaching of law formation. Their opponents, without denying the fruitfulness of the comparative approach to the history of law, pointed out on the impossibility of the difficult tasks of comparative history of law fulfillment and sought to direct efforts to achieve practical goals, offering selectivity and teleology in research.

Authors and Affiliations

Oleksiy Kresin

Keywords

Related Articles

Legal anthropology: formation and scientific status

Improving the human factor in the processes of society and the State necessitated analysis of various social phenomena, including the state and law on the basis of anthropological philosophical approach, defined by moder...

VIII International scientific and practical conference "Legal Reform: Concept, Goal, Implementation" to the 85th anniversary of Academician of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Yaroslavna Shevchenko"

VIII International scientific and practical conference "Legal Reform: Concept, Goal, Implementation" to the 85th anniversary of Academician of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Yaroslavna Shevchenko"

To the question about interpretation of concept “legal culture”

Studies by various authors on the issue of legal culture, is a considerable asset in the legal field and diversity of scientific research. Currently, the term «legal culture» is widely used by scientists, legislators, po...

Constitutional Principles of the Organization of the Government: Theoretical Aspects

In article specifics of functioning and development of civil society with system of the government are investigated. Speaking about interaction of civil society and the State, it is not about some abstract state educatio...

Criminal legal protection of bases of state sovereignty is on leg- islation of foreign countries

In the article the criminal legislative of foreign countries is examined in part of responsi- bility for criminals against bases of state sovereignty. To one of the priority areas of criminal law reform include improving...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP433115
  • DOI -
  • Views 79
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Oleksiy Kresin (2017). Formation of the comparative history of law as a scientific and educational discipline in the second half of XVIII – the first third of XIX centuries. Правова держава. Щорічник наукових праць (Pravova derzhava), 28(), 382-391. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-433115