GEOTHERMAL ENERGY VERSUS CCS AND CCU

Apply

GEOTHERMAL ENERGY VERSUS CCS AND CCU

Journal Title: Biuletyn Państwowego Instytutu Geologicznego - Year 2012, Vol 448, Issue 448

Abstract

he issue of potential conflict of interests between CO[sub]2[/sub] geological storage in saline aquifers (CCS – Carbon Capture and Storage) and low-enthalpy geothermal energy is often raised by opponents of the CCS in Poland and other European countries of similar geological conditions. However, contrary to those opponents, processes accompanying CO[sub]2[/sub] injection into deep saline aquifers can be simultaneously used for both sequestration and associated production of clean energy. Sedimentary formations occurring in the Permian-Mesozoic Basin, covering the Northern Germany, Denmark, the Netherlands North Sea, eastern England and more than a half of the territory of Poland contain deep waters of variable salinity. It is possible to combine geothermal and CCS, both in order to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and for cost-efficient heat and/or electricity generation.The first concept is the use of CO[sub]2[/sub] in closed, unconventional geothermal systems (HDR – Hot Dry Rock). In case of HDR fracturing is carried out in order to enhance reservoir properties of rocks at depth of at least 3 km, reaching a temperature of minimum 95–100°C, sufficient for heat and electricity generation. This method combines the geothermal energy and CO2 injection instead of water in a closed loop. Therefore, this method should be classified mostly as CCU, subordinately as CCS. Although it does not neutralize huge amounts of CO[sub]2[/sub] in comparison with conventional geological storage (only about 10% of injected gas is ultimately stored in the host rock), the CCU method is much desired and produces geothermal energy with much better efficiency than the classical geothermal loop using water as a medium transporting the heat – which is the main economical and ecological advantage of this method.The second concept uses sedimentary rocks of good reservoir properties, containing saline aquifers, usually less suitable for geothermal because of high corrosivity and generally weak thermal properties (at least in Poland). CO[sub]2[/sub] is injected into the saline aquifer, and appears at depth of minimum 800 m in a phase similar to a liquid, but of density lower than brine, so it remains on top as a plume. If most of the injected CO[sub]2[/sub] remains in the aquifer (i.e. it is sequestered), part of it is re-circulated in a closed loop for the heat exchange or electricity generation in a turbine. At the depth of more than 800 m, in the temperature of tens of C degrees plus, the carbon dioxide transmits the heat/energy stream several times more efficiently than the water/brine medium, which makes economic sense of such an approach.

Authors and Affiliations

Adam WÓJCICKI

Keywords

CCS CCU geotermia HDR sekwestracja CO2 poziomy solankowe kogeneracja energii

TOTAL POROSITY AND MATRIX PARAMETERS OF CARBONATE ROCKS BASED ON THE ELASTIC WAVE VELOCITY AND DENSITY MEASUREMENTS

The purpose of the research was to find relationship between elastic waves velocities obtained from lab measurements and parameters from hydrogeological research. Measurements were conducted on 73 rock samples originatin...

RECORD OF CHANGES IN THE OLIGOCENE–MIOCENE SEDIMENTS OF THE MENILITE–KROSNO SERIES OF THE SKOLE UNIT BASED ON CALCAREOUS NANNOPLANKTON STUDIES – BIOSTRATIGRAPHY AND PALAEOGEOGRAPHICAL IMPLICATIONS (POLISH OUTER CARPATHIANS)

The biostratigraphic investigation included the Menilite–Krosno Series of the Skole Unit overlying the Globigerina Marls. Seven calcareous nannoplankton zones (sensu Martini, 1971) were distinguished in these sediments:...

EP ID EP64311
DOI -
Views 41
Downloads 0