Hemodynamic Stability and Analgesia with Different Doses of Intrathecal Fentanyl Added to Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing TURP – A Comparative Study

Journal Title: Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research - Year 2017, Vol 5, Issue 7

Abstract

Background: Transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) is one of the most common procedures performed in elderly men for benign prostatic hypertrophy. Subarachnoid block is considered the technique of choice, as it is the fastest, most predictable and reliable form of regional anaesthesia. Several adjuvants have been added to hyperbaric bupivacaine to improve the quality of the block. Here we have evaluated the effects of two different doses of intrathecally administered fentanyl (12.5microgram and 25 micro gram) along with hyperbaric bupivacaine, in patients undergoing transurethral resection of prostate. Methods and findings: This prospective randomised double blind study was carried out in 75 ASA 1-11 adults aged 50 to 80 years of age who were scheduled to undergo TURP under sub arachnoid block. Patients were divided in to 3 groups.Group1 received 0.5%bupivacaine heavy 1.5ml made to 2 ml with normal saline intrathecally. Group 2 received 0.5% bupivacaine heavy1.5 ml +25 microgram fentanyl .Group 3 received 1.5ml bupivacaine+12.5 microgram fentanyl made to 2ml with normal saline. Onset of adequate sensory blockade, cardiovascular stability, duration of post op analgesia and incidence of complications were assessed and compared. Results: Onset time for adequate block (T10) was significantly less for fentanyl groups when compared to bupivacaine alone group .Duration of analgesia was more for fentanyl groups when compared to bupivacaine alone group (p<0.05). But among fentanyl groups, the duration of analgesia was comparable (P>0.05) All three groups had comparable haemodynamic stability and there was no statistically significant difference in the occurance of major side effects. Conclusion: Addition of 12.5 microgram of fentanyl to 1.5cc of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% is an effective and safe method to provide good intra operative anaesthesia and prolonged post operative analgesia for elderly patients undergoing TURP.

Authors and Affiliations

Elizabeth Joseph

Keywords

Related Articles

HIV Infection and Malignancy

HIV-infected individuals have an increased propensity to develop malignancy. The spectrum of neoplasia in these patients is changing, especially in developed portions of the world, where the widespread use of highly acti...

Effect of Eccentric Exercise in Treatment of De-Quervian's Disease

Objective: This study was carried to determine the effect of eccentric exercises in treatment of De Quervian’s disease Methods: Thirty female patients diagnosed as De Quervian’s tenosynovitis was randomly distributed int...

A Rare and Aggressive, Subcutaneous Panniculitis-like T-cell Cutaneous Lymphoma

Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL) is a distinct variant of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, characterized by primary involvement of the subcutaneous tissue in a manner imitating panniculitis. It accounts f...

Incidence of Adenocarcinoma Prostate and Correlation with S.PSA and Digital Rectal Examination and Bone Scintigraphy in Our Hospital

Serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) has been used as an accurate means of detecting and monitoring prostate cancer. An analysis of PSA levels, digital rectal examination and bone scan findings was carried out in a grou...

A Study on the Clinical and Radiologic Profile of Patients with Vascular Parkinsonism

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to analyse the clinical and neuroimaging features of patients with Vascular Parkinsonism Background: Vascular Parkinsonism is a form of secondary Parkinsonism resulting from cereb...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP527240
  • DOI -
  • Views 65
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Elizabeth Joseph (2017). Hemodynamic Stability and Analgesia with Different Doses of Intrathecal Fentanyl Added to Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing TURP – A Comparative Study. Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research, 5(7), 25304-25313. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-527240