Herbert Simon’s spell on judgment and decision making

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2011, Vol 6, Issue 8

Abstract

How many judgment and decision making (JDM) researchers have not claimed to be building on Herbert Simon’s work? We identify two of Simon’s goals for JDM research: He sought to understand people’s decision processes—the descriptive goal—and studied whether the same processes lead to good decisions—the prescriptive goal. To investigate how recent JDM research relates to these goals, we analyzed the articles published in the Journal of Behavioral Decision Making and in Judgment and Decision Making from 2006 to 2010. Out of 377 articles, 91 cite Simon or we judged them as directly relating to his goals. We asked whether these articles are integrative, in the following sense: For a descriptive article we asked if it contributes to building a theory that reconciles different conceptualizations of cognition such as neural networks and heuristics. For a prescriptive article we asked if it contributes to building a method that combines ideas of other methods such as heuristics and optimization models. Based on our subjective judgments we found that the proportion of integrative articles was 67% of the prescriptive and 52% of the descriptive articles. We offer suggestions for achieving more integration of JDM theories. The article concludes with the thesis that although JDM researchers work under Simon’s spell, no one really knows what that spell is.

Authors and Affiliations

Konstantinos V. Katsikopoulos and Cherng-Horng (Dan) Lan

Keywords

Related Articles

Sense of control matters: a long spatial distance leads to a short-term investment preference

Increasingly, we can invest in projects that are distributed around the world through online investment platforms. Will the spatial distance between these projects and ourselves affect our investment preferences? The pre...

Coherence and correspondence in engineering design: informing the conversation and connecting with judgment and decision-making research

I show how the coherence/correspondence distinction can inform the conversation about decision methods for engineering design. Some engineers argue for the application of multi-attribute utility theory while others argue...

The effect of dynamic proximity cues on counterfactual plausibility

Previous research has found that people consult closeness or proximity cues when they evaluate the plausibility or likelihood of a counterfactual alternative to reality. In this paper we asked whether the plausibility of...

Methodological pitfalls of the Unconscious Thought paradigm

According to Unconscious Thought Theory (UTT: Dijksterhuis & Nordgren, 2006), complex decisions are best made after a period of distraction assumed to elicit “unconscious thought”. Over three studies, respectively offeri...

“Isn’t everyone like me?”: On the presence of self-similarity in strategic interactions

We propose that in strategic interactions a player is influenced by self-similarity. Self-similarity means that a player who chooses some action X tends to believe, to a greater extent than a player who chooses a differe...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677856
  • DOI -
  • Views 145
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Konstantinos V. Katsikopoulos and Cherng-Horng (Dan) Lan (2011). Herbert Simon’s spell on judgment and decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(8), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677856