How decision context changes the balance between cost and benefit increasing charitable donations

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2019, Vol 14, Issue 2

Abstract

Recent research on charitable donations shows that donors evaluate both the impact of helping and its cost. We asked whether these evaluations were affected by the context of alternative charitable causes. We found that presenting two donation appeals in joint evaluation, as compared to separate evaluation, increased the perceived benefit of the cause ranked as more important (Study 1), and decreased its perceived cost, regardless of the relative actual costs (Study 2). Finally, we try to reconcile an explanation based on perceived cost and benefit with previous work on charitable donations.

Authors and Affiliations

Marta Caserotti, Enrico Rubaltelli and Paul Slovic

Keywords

Related Articles

Post-decision search in repeated and variable environments

When faced with a decision, people collect information to help them decide. Though it may seem unnecessary, people often continue to search for information about alternatives after they have already chosen an option, eve...

It’s not fair: Folk intuitions about disadvantageous and advantageous inequity aversion

People often object to inequity; they react negatively to receiving less than others (disadvantageous inequity aversion), and more than others (advantageous inequity aversion). Here we study people’s folk intuitions abou...

Decision-making styles and their associations with decision-making competencies and mental health

This study investigates the psychometric characteristics of the General Decision-Making Scale (GDMS) on a sample of Slovak high-school and university students. Secondly, it addresses the relationship between decision-mak...

How to make a risk seem riskier: The ratio bias versus construal level theory

Which statement conveys greater risk: “100 people die from cancer every day” or “36,500 people die from cancer every year”? In statistics where both frequencies and temporal information are used to convey risk, two theor...

The default pull: An experimental demonstration of subtle default effects on preferences

The impact of default options on choice is a reliable, well-established behavioral finding. However, several different effects may lend to choosing defaults in an often indistinguishable manner, including loss aversion,...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678410
  • DOI -
  • Views 113
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Marta Caserotti, Enrico Rubaltelli and Paul Slovic (2019). How decision context changes the balance between cost and benefit increasing charitable donations. Judgment and Decision Making, 14(2), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678410