How Federalism Can Promote a National Commitment to the Rule of Law

Journal Title: Studia Iuridica - Year 2019, Vol 79, Issue

Abstract

Promoting the rule of the law is a national responsibility. The obligation to ensure legality and advance human rights rests on the national government. This article analyzes how federalism, a system of distributing power among subnational entities, can promote this national goal. The article explores how states in the United States have played an important role in encouraging the federal government to enforce the law and safeguard rights. By means of resistance, cooperation, and redundancy, states have moved the United States closer to rule-of-law ideals. The state action sometimes takes the form of litigation, with states bringing suit against the federal government. Such suits have particular significance in challenging illegal inaction by the national government, as when the federal government fails to enforce environmental laws. Litigation by states may overcome standing barriers that would limit such suits by private individuals. States may also engage in direct action by pursuing their own policies that promote the rule of law. In these areas, the states may oppose the federal government, cooperate with the federal government, or act in an independent, parallel manner. What unites all of these modes and instruments of state-federal interaction is that the goal of states is to influence national policy. The state action may begin within the boundaries of a particular state, but what motivates the state initiative is a vision applicable to the nation as a whole. The ultimate aim of state action is not local divergence, but national uniformity. Federalism serves not as a license for local deviation from national norms, but instead as a means for states to engage actively in creating policy at a national level. In this way, independent state activity can indeed promote the national obligation to promote the rule of law throughout the country.<br/><br/>

Authors and Affiliations

Robert A. Schapiro

Keywords

Related Articles

Układ części ogólnej postępowania nieprocesowego

The article presents the problems of the arrangement of the part of general non-contentious proceedings (art. 506–525 of the Code of Civil Procedure of 1964 ‒ abbreviation: „c.c.p.”). The scope of this issue includes thr...

State Treasury Lands Resources – Selected Remarks on Legal Principles of Administration

The article concentrates on a brief description of Polish modern law and regulation concerning state land resources as a result of a political system changes in Poland from the 1990s of XX century. I discusses basic regu...

British-Polish Protocol in light of the Court of Justice of the European Union jurisprudence (N.S. v Secretary of State, Bonda, Fransson)

The Protocol No. 30 on the application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to Poland and to the United Kingdom, so called “British-Polish Protocol”, annexed in 2007 to the Treaties by means of the...

Acquis Communautaire in the Field of Nuclear and Radiation Safety and Ukrainian Legislation: Prospects and Challenges of Harmonization

Since the Chernobyl disaster, special attention is paid in Ukraine to legislation in the field of nuclear energy and radiation safety. A new stage of enhancing Ukrainian nuclear and radiation safety legislation began wit...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP559836
  • DOI 10.5604/01.3001.0013.1891
  • Views 92
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Robert A. Schapiro (2019). How Federalism Can Promote a National Commitment to the Rule of Law. Studia Iuridica, 79(), 131-147. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-559836