How Federalism Can Promote a National Commitment to the Rule of Law

Journal Title: Studia Iuridica - Year 2019, Vol 79, Issue

Abstract

Promoting the rule of the law is a national responsibility. The obligation to ensure legality and advance human rights rests on the national government. This article analyzes how federalism, a system of distributing power among subnational entities, can promote this national goal. The article explores how states in the United States have played an important role in encouraging the federal government to enforce the law and safeguard rights. By means of resistance, cooperation, and redundancy, states have moved the United States closer to rule-of-law ideals. The state action sometimes takes the form of litigation, with states bringing suit against the federal government. Such suits have particular significance in challenging illegal inaction by the national government, as when the federal government fails to enforce environmental laws. Litigation by states may overcome standing barriers that would limit such suits by private individuals. States may also engage in direct action by pursuing their own policies that promote the rule of law. In these areas, the states may oppose the federal government, cooperate with the federal government, or act in an independent, parallel manner. What unites all of these modes and instruments of state-federal interaction is that the goal of states is to influence national policy. The state action may begin within the boundaries of a particular state, but what motivates the state initiative is a vision applicable to the nation as a whole. The ultimate aim of state action is not local divergence, but national uniformity. Federalism serves not as a license for local deviation from national norms, but instead as a means for states to engage actively in creating policy at a national level. In this way, independent state activity can indeed promote the national obligation to promote the rule of law throughout the country.<br/><br/>

Authors and Affiliations

Robert A. Schapiro

Keywords

Related Articles

Dobrowolny system znakowania „wolne od GMO” – doświadczenia systemu niemieckiego w kontekście projektu polskiej ustawy

The article is an attempt to present the draft of the act on the labeling of products made without the use of genetically modified organisms designed by the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development and on the amendm...

Artykuł 28 § 1 k.k. po nowelizacji z dnia 20 lutego 2015 r. Uwagi na temat konieczności oddzielania strony podmiotowej czynu zabronionego od winy

The object of analysis is the amended art. 28 § 1 of the Penal Code, which stipulates that „whoever commits an act while being in justifiable error as to a circumstance constituting a feature of an prohibited act, shall...

Influence of EU law on Collective Labour Law in Poland (Institutions at the National Level)

Although the competences of the EU in the field of industrial relations are limited, European standards concerning collective labour law have significantly affected domestic legal systems, including Polish law. EU legisl...

Potencjalna rola klinik prawa w przeciwdziałaniu zjawisku korupcji na Ukrainie – edukacja jako element strategicznych działań antykorupcyjnych

The article presents the status of clinical education in Ukraine. The author examines the potential role of law clinics and students in the anti-corruption activities in this country. The author postulates, also, the nee...

Urban Climate Change Governance in China 2015

W ciągu ostatnich 30 lat Chiny doświadczyły gwałtownego rozwoju ekonomicznego i urbanizacyjnego. Spowodowało to degradację środowiska i znaczne zużycie infrastruktury oraz surowców naturalnych. Podczas gdy chiński poziom...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP559836
  • DOI 10.5604/01.3001.0013.1891
  • Views 64
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Robert A. Schapiro (2019). How Federalism Can Promote a National Commitment to the Rule of Law. Studia Iuridica, 79(), 131-147. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-559836