How Federalism Can Promote a National Commitment to the Rule of Law
Journal Title: Studia Iuridica - Year 2019, Vol 79, Issue
Abstract
Promoting the rule of the law is a national responsibility. The obligation to ensure legality and advance human rights rests on the national government. This article analyzes how federalism, a system of distributing power among subnational entities, can promote this national goal. The article explores how states in the United States have played an important role in encouraging the federal government to enforce the law and safeguard rights. By means of resistance, cooperation, and redundancy, states have moved the United States closer to rule-of-law ideals. The state action sometimes takes the form of litigation, with states bringing suit against the federal government. Such suits have particular significance in challenging illegal inaction by the national government, as when the federal government fails to enforce environmental laws. Litigation by states may overcome standing barriers that would limit such suits by private individuals. States may also engage in direct action by pursuing their own policies that promote the rule of law. In these areas, the states may oppose the federal government, cooperate with the federal government, or act in an independent, parallel manner. What unites all of these modes and instruments of state-federal interaction is that the goal of states is to influence national policy. The state action may begin within the boundaries of a particular state, but what motivates the state initiative is a vision applicable to the nation as a whole. The ultimate aim of state action is not local divergence, but national uniformity. Federalism serves not as a license for local deviation from national norms, but instead as a means for states to engage actively in creating policy at a national level. In this way, independent state activity can indeed promote the national obligation to promote the rule of law throughout the country.<br/><br/>
Authors and Affiliations
Robert A. Schapiro
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP559836
- DOI 10.5604/01.3001.0013.1891
- Views 85
- Downloads 0
Glosa krytyczna do uchwały składu 7 sędziów Sądu Najwyższego z 25 lutego 2016 r. (I KZP 20/15)
The Supreme Court’s resolution of 25 February 2016 states that the statutory term „person in cohabitation” permits the absence of gender difference, extending in practice new civil and criminal-procedural rights of homos...
Spór o Trybunał Konstytucyjny – geneza i istota problemu, skutki, scenariusze na przyszłość
The dispute over the Constitutional Tribunal is primarily of a personal nature and concerns two issues: 1) the legality of choosing three people for the position of judge of the Constitutional Tribunal: Mariusz Muszyński...
Problem stosowania najważniejszych aktów prawa alimentacyjnego międzynarodowego w relacjach polsko-hiszpańskich w kontekście egzekucji alimentów na rzecz przebywającego w Polsce dziecka od zobowiązanego przebywającego w Hiszpanii
This publication presents the evolution of international law acts in the scope of alimony execution from the obliged one residing on the territory of Spain, for the benefit of a child, having the enforcement order and re...
Tajność głosowania w prawie wyborczym wybranych państw Europy Środkowej
The article describes Polish, Czech and Lithuanian regulations on secret ballot, with a particular emphasis on the functionality and technical aspects of its execution. The two main methods of voting subjected to researc...
Prawne uwarunkowania zmiany lasu na użytek rolny ......... 254 Sławomir Lewandowski – Argumentacja prawnicza w relacjach prawnik – klient
The subject of the paper is the legal issue of changing the forest for agricultural use regulated in art. 13 para. 2 of the Forest Act. The aim of the paper is an attempt to determine what circumstances empower the autho...