HUMANISTICS OF CHARLES WILLIAM MORRIS

Abstract

Contemporary philosophy of science and epistemology revert to the project of the unity of sciences introduced by Rudolf Carnap, Charles William Morris and Otto Neurath in 1930s. It leads to revision of philosophy and semiotics of Charles William Morris, including Ch. W. Morris’ humanistics. According to Ch. W. Morris humanistics is either socio-humanistic sciences or meta-language of socio-humanistic sciences. Depending on what humanistics is – theory of value or descriptive semiotics, it appears as an axiological humanistics or as a scientific humanistics correspondingly. Axiological humanistics is a valuative use of signs which is the reason for preferential behavior. Axiological humanistics as a theory of value is not distinguished from socio-humanistic sciences. And what is more, socio-humanistic sciences make up axiological humanistics. Scientific humanistics as a descriptive semiotics explores actual use of signs in socio-humanistic sciences. Scientific humanistics is a metalanguage of socio-humanistic sciences which Ch. W. Morris qualified as semiotical sciences, i. e. sciences that study semiotic reality, realm of signs and meanings. Since axiological humanistics is socio-humanistic sciences, scientific humanistics is a meta-language of axiological humanistics. In any case scientific humanistics appears to be semiotics of semiotics, i. e. metasemiotics. Scientific humanistics is similar to scientific empiricism over both are semiotics. Thanks to this fact the unity of natural and socio-humanistic sciences can be achieved. But scientific humanistics is different from scientific empiricism because scientific humanistics is a semiotics of semiotical sciences, i. e. meta-semiotics, and scientific empiricism is a semiotics of non-semiotical sciences, i. e. just semiotics.

Authors and Affiliations

Konstantin RAYHERT

Keywords

Related Articles

FRATERNITY OF THE HOLINESS PHOTIUS AND GALLICAN LITURGY

This article contributes to the reconstruction of the important for the history of Russian Religious and Philosophical Renaissance plot. The focus is on a theoretical analysis of the project to create an Orthodox religio...

TRANSDISCIPLINARY AND PROFESSIONALISM

Development of transdisciplinary strategies involves addressing the question of the relationship between professionals and amateurs in science. The invasion of a foreign professional sphere turns it into an amateur. Effe...

THE PROBLEMS OF IDENTITY IN SHAKESPEARE’S «KING LEAR»

The problems of identity in Shakespeare’s plays has many aspects. One of them is relayed to the problem of persecution and exile (including self-exile) that force characters to adopt new identity. Exile itself has differ...

LAUDATIO IMPERII. UNTIMELY REFLECTION AFTER THE SUNSET OF A “GREAT IDEA”

When it comes to the philosophical reception of the imperial idea and practice between the two world wars, we recognize Ortega y Gasset, Evola and Heidegger as the most typical figures. True, they paid her different atte...

GRACE AND ENVY: DANTE RESPONDS TO RENE GIRARD

The article proves that according to Girard envy is the most important property of a person, determining the order of violence and victims. It is shown that, in the light of the anthropological significance of envy, Gira...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP342381
  • DOI -
  • Views 70
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Konstantin RAYHERT (2016). HUMANISTICS OF CHARLES WILLIAM MORRIS. Δόξα / Докса. Збірник наукових праць з філософії та філології, 2(), 27-36. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-342381