Hylomorphic Animalism, Emergentism, and the Challenge of the New Mechanist Philosophy of Neuroscience
Journal Title: Scientia et Fides - Year 2017, Vol 5, Issue 2
Abstract
This article, the first of a two-part essay, presents an account of Aristotelian hylomorphic animalism that engages with recent work on neuroscience and philosophy of mind. I show that Aristotelian hylomorphic animalism is compatible with the new mechanist approach to neuroscience and psychology, but that it is incompatible with strong emergentism in the philosophy of mind. I begin with the basic claims of Aristotelian hylomorphic animalism and focus on its understanding of psychological powers embodied in the nervous system. Next, I introduce the new mechanist approach to neuroscience and psychology and illustrate how it can enrich the more abstract ontological framework of Aristotelian hylomorphic animalism. In the third section of this article I establish in detail the many ways Aristotelian hylomorphic animalism is incompatible with strong emergentism in the philosophy of mind. Based on these fundamental differences I show why a criticism leveled against emergentism by the new mechanist philosophy does not hamper my proposed rapprochement between hylomorphism and the new mechanist philosophy. This conclusion, however, leaves untouched the problem I address in the second article, namely, is the new mechanist philosophy compatible with Aristotelian philosophical anthropology’s contention that intellectual operations are immaterial and interact with the psychosomatic operations of the rational animal?
Authors and Affiliations
Daniel D. De Haan
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP327434
- DOI 10.12775/SetF.2017.025
- Views 82
- Downloads 0
Homo technologicus and the Recovery of a Universal Ethic: Maximus the Confessor and Romano Guardini
On September 1st2017, Pope Francis and the Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew issued a Joint Message for the World Day of Prayer for Creation. The gesture reveals the church’s efforts “to breathe with two lungs” on the urg...
Ragionevolezza della fede. Rapporto tra fede e ragione in Tommaso d’Aquino
Rationality of faith. Relationship between faith and reason in Thomas Aquinas The rationality of the Christian faith has been an issue debated for centuries. The relationship between faith and reason is an intrinsic rea...
Del uso de la voluntad en el De anima de Suárez
On the use of the will in the Suárez’s De anima Suarez defines the notion of dominion [dominium] in the relationship that human beings have with the world and with reality. This dominion is linked to the psychological n...
Law, Knowledge and Action in Suárez
This paper explores some presuppositions in Francisco Suárez’s theory of law. I intend to show that his doctrine of law can be understood more deeply attending to the role the intellect and the will play in its genesis,...
Suárez y quienes negaron el intelecto agente en el s. XVI
Suárez and who denied the agent intellect in s. XVI In this paper three theses on the agent intellect of various Renaissance writers are studied: a) those that deny the real distinction between one and another intellect...