Hylomorphic Animalism, Emergentism, and the Challenge of the New Mechanist Philosophy of Neuroscience
Journal Title: Scientia et Fides - Year 2017, Vol 5, Issue 2
Abstract
This article, the first of a two-part essay, presents an account of Aristotelian hylomorphic animalism that engages with recent work on neuroscience and philosophy of mind. I show that Aristotelian hylomorphic animalism is compatible with the new mechanist approach to neuroscience and psychology, but that it is incompatible with strong emergentism in the philosophy of mind. I begin with the basic claims of Aristotelian hylomorphic animalism and focus on its understanding of psychological powers embodied in the nervous system. Next, I introduce the new mechanist approach to neuroscience and psychology and illustrate how it can enrich the more abstract ontological framework of Aristotelian hylomorphic animalism. In the third section of this article I establish in detail the many ways Aristotelian hylomorphic animalism is incompatible with strong emergentism in the philosophy of mind. Based on these fundamental differences I show why a criticism leveled against emergentism by the new mechanist philosophy does not hamper my proposed rapprochement between hylomorphism and the new mechanist philosophy. This conclusion, however, leaves untouched the problem I address in the second article, namely, is the new mechanist philosophy compatible with Aristotelian philosophical anthropology’s contention that intellectual operations are immaterial and interact with the psychosomatic operations of the rational animal?
Authors and Affiliations
Daniel D. De Haan
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP327434
- DOI 10.12775/SetF.2017.025
- Views 68
- Downloads 0
El bien como objeto del querer. Suárez y los presupuestos apetitivos y cognoscitivos de la acción racional
The good as the object of wanting. Suárez on the appetitive and cognitive conditions of rational action This paper discusses Suárez’s characterization of the formal object of wanting, i.e. the good. Wanting, in all its...
Los tratados médicos renacentistas en la gnoseología de Francisco Suárez
Renaissance medical treatises in the psychology of Francisco Suarez Spanish Renaissance physicians, especially Francis Valles, are a major source of inspiration for Suarez's commentary to De anima. This paper analyzes t...
La teología como posibilidad fundante de una ciencia más humana
Paul Karl Feyerabend conceives religion as a possible way to infuse meaning and humanity to the science. He asserts that when it has taken place historically a unity between science and religion, science has been able to...
Breaking Mariano Artigas’ Frontiers of Evolutionism
I review Mariano Artigas’ appraisal of Evolution as reflected in some of his works. I find that his perception of evolutionary theory changed from a critical attitude, mainly directed against the modern synthesis of the...
Il constante progredire della frontiera tra teologia e scienza. Parte 2º: Metafisica
On constant movement of frontiers between Science and Theology. Part 2: Metaphysics In the first part (Karwasz, Scientia et Fides, 3(1) 2015) entitled “Physics” we showed how discoveries of modern sciences do not contra...