ЯК МОВА РЭАГУЕ НА РАСЕЙСКА-ЎКРАІНСКУЮ ВАЙНУ (ПАЛІТАЛЯГІЧНЫЯ І САЦЫЯЛІНГВІСТЫЧНЫЯ ЗАЎВАГІ)

Abstract

The subject of this article is the language of war (Russian-Ukrainian), language of authoritarianism, as part of the official propaganda. In the center of the work is the Belarusian language and how it responds to a war that takes place outside the country, how it describes the war, and transmits the ideological orientation of different political forces. The study covers the internal dimension: how the Belarusian language, more precisely Belarusian-speaking residents, create new words and idioms that describe authoritarianism, and often make fun of it. The language of war is being investigated through the prism of national stereotypes, which in radical conditions turn into hate speech and may lead to war. However, the article touches on an unexpected dimension: under the influence of the activity of Russian radical groups that are conventionally dubbed “Russian world” the Belarusian language became the object of attacks, criticism, the real victim of propaganda and war. Finally, the study included experience of similar cases both in historical and geographical perspectives. For example, the experience of the Ukrainian, the Kurdish, the Bosnian or the Tajik languages at the present stage and that of the French, the Belarusian and the Russian languages in a historical perspective. The issue of language, politics and nationalism in the context of authoritarianism remains central to the understanding of international military conflicts and often is underestimated in official social and humanitarian science. Conversely, alternative science helps to renew and analyze similar cases and, possibly, to help avoid their repetition.

Authors and Affiliations

Uladzislaŭ Ivanoŭ

Keywords

Related Articles

(К)АБЫ НЕ БЫЛО ВАЙНЫ: ДАВЕР ЯК СТАЎКА І МЭТА ІНФАРМАЦЫЙНАЙ ВАЙНЫ

The article is devoted to the substantiation of the legitimacy of the use of concepts of trust and social becoming that was proposed by P. Sztompka in the context of the practice of media consumption. The purpose of this...

ІДЕОЛОГІЧНІ ФОРМИ ТА ЦІННІСНІ МОДИФІКАЦІЇ ПАТРІОТИЗМУ УКРАЇНСЬКОЇ МОЛОДІ (НА ОСНОВІ АНАЛІЗУ МОДЕРОВАНИХ ГРУПОВИХ ДИСКУСІЙ)

The article deals with the main ideological forms and features of the mobilization practices of patriotism. Values modification of patriotism in the minds of Ukrainian youth, its motivation and demotivation factors to be...

Демодернизация или внутренние противоречия модерна?

his article is devoted to criticism of the demodernization concept as a diagnosis of modern negative social and political phenomena. Author sees the main weakness of the demodernization concept in seeing the driving idea...

МЕЖДУ ФРУСТРАЦИЕЙ И МОБИЛИЗАЦИЕЙ: ЭМОЦИОНАЛЬНЫЕ ДИСПОЗИЦИИ ГУМАНИТАРНОЙ МЫСЛИ В УСЛОВИЯХ НАШЕГО ВОЕННОГО ВРЕМЕНИ

The article is devoted to the ability of the humanities scholars to contribute to the demilitarization of our life-world. The starting point of the analysis is the recognition of the affective conditionedness of any thin...

ТЕРРОРИЗМ, СПРАВЕДЛИВОСТЬ И ВОЙНА. СКОЛЬКО ВСАДНИКОВ У АПОКАЛИПСИСА?

The article contains the critique of the orthodox conceptions of terrorism, which tend to make a category mistake by defining terrorism as a free standing institute alongside war or an objective method of massive violenc...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP630327
  • DOI -
  • Views 95
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Uladzislaŭ Ivanoŭ (2018). ЯК МОВА РЭАГУЕ НА РАСЕЙСКА-ЎКРАІНСКУЮ ВАЙНУ (ПАЛІТАЛЯГІЧНЫЯ І САЦЫЯЛІНГВІСТЫЧНЫЯ ЗАЎВАГІ). Идеология и политика (рус) / Ідеологія і політика (укр) / Ideology and Politics (Eng), 11(3), 244-269. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-630327