Identyfikacja partyjna i bliskość programowa partii jako determinanty decyzji wyborczej w wyborach parlamentarnych w 2011 roku
Journal Title: Studia Socjologiczno-Polityczne. Seria Nowa - Year 2015, Vol 3, Issue 1
Abstract
So far Poland has experienced extremely high levels of electoral volatility, which indicated a lack of strong links between political parties and voters. Thus, the assumption may be made that the electoral decision in Poland is based on substantive reasons, such as, for example, the closest to voters solutions to the most important problems, proposed by political parties. However, since 2005, in Poland we have had a strong emotional polarization of the political scene. Two major parties – Platforma Obywatelska [the Civic Platform] and Prawo i Sprawiedliwość [Law and Justice] − effectively managed the political conflict (by reference to social solidarity and liberalism) and polarized the Polish political scene, using the social processes (increasing economic and cultural differences), divided the Poles into two camps and provided foundations to form identification with the party, which according to the theory determines the electoral decision, regardless of other factors. This article aims to answer the question whether in the light of changes on the political scene the Poles’ electoral decision is driven by substantive assessment of the party or maybe cultural wars in Poland contributed to creating a relatively stable identification with the party determining the electoral decision irrespective of other factors. Empirical analyses on the parliamentary election of 2011 reveal that existing in Poland identification with parties strongly determines the voting decision, weakening then the impact of other variables, including socio-demographic ones. Nevertheless, some voters make a rational decision and choose the party best reflecting their political beliefs, or vote strategically.
Authors and Affiliations
Marta Żerkowska-Balas
Itsembabwoko oznacza genocyd. Sprawiedliwość transformacyjna i pamięć o ludobójstwie w Rwandzie
The purpose of the article is to analyse the transitional justice in Rwanda, the mechanism of reconciliation, peacebuilding after the genocide and post-conflict recovery of the society. In the introduction, the evolution...
Recenzja książki Christophera H. Achena i Larry’ego M. Bartelsa, Democracy for realists. Why elections do not produce responsive government (Princeton University Press, 2016)
-
Stan i perspektywy nauki o stosunkach międzynarodowych w Polsce. Recenzja pracy zbiorowej Jacka Czaputowicza, Kamila Ławniczaka i Anny Wojciuk, Nauka o stosunkach międzynarodowych i studia europejskie w Polsce (Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR, 2015)
-
Otwarty marksizm i odrodzenie socjologii: rola Juliana Hochfelda i Zygmunta Baumana
In 1956, political liberalization in Poland resulted in the revival of sociology, previously banned from Polish universities. Julian Hochfeld (1911–1966), previously a leading Socialist politician and currently professor...
Powroty do Juliana Hochfelda
The aim of the article is to recall and present the political and intellectual figure of J. Hochfeld (1911–1966) against the background of the contemporary – often ahistorical – attempts to reconstruct historical memory...