Imagine being a nice guy: A note on hypothetical vs. incentivized social preferences

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2015, Vol 10, Issue 2

Abstract

We conducted an experimental study on social preferences using dictator games similar to Fehr et al. (2008). Our results show that social preferences differ between subjects who receive low-stakes monetary rewards for their decisions and subjects who consider hypothetical stakes. Our findings indicate that, apart from incentives, gender plays an important role for the categorization of different social preferences.

Authors and Affiliations

Christoph Bühren and Thorben C. Kundt

Keywords

Related Articles

Choice blindness in financial decision making

Choice Blindness is an experimental paradigm that examines the interplay between individuals’ preferences, decisions, and expectations by manipulating the relationship between intention and choice. This paper expands upo...

The coexistence of overestimation and underweighting of rare events and the contingent recency effect

Previous research demonstrates overestimation of rare events in judgment tasks, and underweighting of rare events in decisions from experience. The current paper presents three laboratory experiments and a field study th...

Decisions in moral dilemmas: The influence of subjective beliefs in outcome probabilities

Previous studies have found that the proportions of people who endorsed utilitarian decisions varied across different variants of the trolley dilemma. In this paper, we explored whether moral choices were associated with...

Allowing repeat winners

Unbiased lotteries seem the least unfair and simplest procedures to allocate scarce indivisible resources to those with equal claims. But, when lotteries are repeated, it is not immediately obvious whether prior winners...

An alternative approach for eliciting willingness-to-pay: A randomized Internet trial

Open-ended methods that elicit willingness-to-pay (WTP) in terms of absolute dollars often result in high rates of questionable and highly skewed responses, insensitivity to changes in health state, and raise an ethical...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678170
  • DOI -
  • Views 142
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Christoph Bühren and Thorben C. Kundt (2015). Imagine being a nice guy: A note on hypothetical vs. incentivized social preferences. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(2), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678170