Improper Selection of a Pre-specified Primary Dose–Response Analysis Delays Regulatory Drug Approval

Journal Title: The AAPS Journal - Year 2013, Vol 15, Issue 2

Abstract

Dose–response analysis is one of the accepted efficacy endpoints to establish effectiveness. The purpose of this research was to inform selection of an appropriate pre-specified primary dose–response analysis to demonstrate drug efficacy in a registration trial. The power and the type I error rate of the placebo-corrected (i.e., simply adjusting the observed treatment value by subtracting the placebo mean) and the placebo-anchored (i.e., including the placebo data as dose 0 in the regression) slope analyses were assessed based on regulatory submission data for two antihypertensive drugs and simulated data from hypothetical clinical trials. In the simulated hypothetical trials, the impact of different dosing strategies (i.e., the fixed dose versus the weight-based per kilogram dose), sample size, and scenarios governing the drug exposure–response relationship (e.g., Emax, ED50, and SD) was also evaluated. For each scenario, a total 300 replications were simulated. The placebo-anchored slope analysis is always more powerful to demonstrate effectiveness in all plausible scenarios. The difference between the placebo-anchored and the placebo-corrected analyses was maximum when the studied doses were too high. However, the dose–response analysis is not sensitive to the dosing strategies. Furthermore, the type I error rate of these two methods was also found to be comparable. The design of dose–response studies should carefully consider these results to justify the inclusion of placebo and the analysis method. The pharmaceutical industry and the regulatory agencies are equally responsible for using the appropriate methods of primary analysis and providing justification in the protocol.

Authors and Affiliations

Jiang Liu, Pravin Jadhav, Yaning Wang, Jogarao Gobburu

Keywords

Related Articles

Similar Intracellular Peptide Profile of TAP1/β2 Microglobulin Double-Knockout Mice and C57BL/6 Wild-Type Mice as Revealed by Peptidomic Analysis

The online version of this article (doi:10.1208/s12248-010-9224-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Population pharmacokinetics of S(−)-carvedilol in healthy volunteers after administration of the immediate-release (IR) and the new controlled-release (CR) dosage forms of the racemate

Carvedilol is a β1-, β1-, and α1-adrenoreceptor blocker indicated for treatment of hypertension and mild-tosevere congestive heart failure. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate...

Applying Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS) Criteria to Predict Oral Absorption of Drugs in Dogs: Challenges and Pitfalls

The Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS) has been a prognostic tool for assessing the potential effects of formulation on the human drug oral bioavailability. When used in conjunction with in vitro dissolution t...

Structure, Size, and Solubility of Antigen Arrays Determines Efficacy in Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis

The online version of this article (doi:10.1208/s12248-014-9654-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Role of animal models in the study of drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions

Drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) are a major problem, in large part because of their unpredictable nature. If we understood the mechanisms of these reactions better, they might be predictable. Their unpredi...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP681095
  • DOI  10.1208/s12248-012-9438-2
  • Views 58
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Jiang Liu, Pravin Jadhav, Yaning Wang, Jogarao Gobburu (2013). Improper Selection of a Pre-specified Primary Dose–Response Analysis Delays Regulatory Drug Approval. The AAPS Journal, 15(2), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-681095