In defense of the personal/impersonal distinction in moral psychology research: Cross-cultural validation of the dual process model of moral judgment

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2011, Vol 6, Issue 3

Abstract

The dual process model of moral judgment (DPM; Greene et al., 2004) argues that such judgments are influenced by both emotion-laden intuition and controlled reasoning. These influences are associated with distinct neural circuitries and different response tendencies. After reanalyzing data from an earlier study, McGuire et al. (2009) questioned the level of support for the dual process model and asserted that the distinction between emotion evoking moral dilemmas (personal dilemmas) and those that do not trigger such intuitions (impersonal dilemmas) is spurious. Using similar reanalysis methods on data reported by Moore, Clark, & Kane (2008), we show that the personal/impersonal distinction is reliable. Furthermore, new data show that this distinction is fundamental to moral judgment across widely different cultures (U.S. and China) and supports claims made by the DPM.

Authors and Affiliations

Adam B. Moore, N. Y. Louis Lee, Brian A. M. Clark and Andrew R. A. Conway

Keywords

Related Articles

Bayesian and frequentist analysis of True and Error models

Birnbaum and Quispe-Torreblanca (2018) presented a frequentist analysis of a family of six True and Error (TE) models for the analysis of two choice problems presented twice to each participant. Lee (2018) performed a Ba...

The retrospective gambler’s fallacy: Unlikely events, constructing the past, and multiple universes

The gambler’s fallacy (Tune, 1964) refers to the belief that a streak is more likely to end than chance would dictate. In three studies, participants exhibited a retrospective gambler’s fallacy (RGF) in which an event th...

Effects of distance between initial estimates and advice on advice utilization

Six experiments investigated how the distance between one’s initial opinion and advice relates to advice utilization. Going beyond previous research, we relate advice distance to both relative adjustments and absolute ad...

Kenneth R. Hammond’s contributions to the study of judgment and decision making

Kenneth R. Hammond (1917–2015) made several major contributions to the science of human judgment and decision making. As a student of Egon Brunswik, he kept Brunswik’s legacy alive – advancing his theory of probabilistic...

Debiasing egocentrism and optimism biases in repeated competitions

When judging their likelihood of success in competitive tasks, people tend to be overoptimistic for easy tasks and overpessimistic for hard tasks (the shared circumstance effect; SCE). Previous research has shown that fe...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677790
  • DOI -
  • Views 123
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Adam B. Moore, N. Y. Louis Lee, Brian A. M. Clark and Andrew R. A. Conway (2011). In defense of the personal/impersonal distinction in moral psychology research: Cross-cultural validation of the dual process model of moral judgment. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(3), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677790