The retrospective gambler’s fallacy: Unlikely events, constructing the past, and multiple universes

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2009, Vol 4, Issue 5

Abstract

The gambler’s fallacy (Tune, 1964) refers to the belief that a streak is more likely to end than chance would dictate. In three studies, participants exhibited a retrospective gambler’s fallacy (RGF) in which an event that seems rare appears to come from a longer sequence than an event that seems more common. Study 1 demonstrates this bias for streaks, while Study 2 does so with single rare events and shows that the appearance of rarity is more important than actual rarity. Study 3 extends these findings from abstract gambling domains into real world domains to demonstrate the generalizability of the effects. The RGF follows from the law of small numbers (Tversky & Kahneman, 1971) and has many applications, from perceptions of the social world to philosophical debates about the existence of multiple universes.

Authors and Affiliations

Daniel M. Oppenheimer and Benoit Monin

Keywords

Related Articles

The Risk-as-feelings hypothesis in a Theory-of-planned-behaviour perspective

The Theory of Planned Behaviour (TpB: Ajzen, 1985; 1991) is based on a utility framework, and the Risk-as-Feelings hypothesis (RaF: Loewenstein, Weber, Hsee, & Welch, 2001) is a feelings-based behavioural model. The TpB...

Do discounts mitigate numerological superstitions? Evidence from the Russian real estate market

In this paper I investigate the impact of numerological superstitions and discounts’ effect on the buyers’ behavior in the apartment market using actual sales data. Based on the dataset from Moscow primary real estate ma...

On the descriptive value of loss aversion in decisions under risk: Six clarifications

Previous studies of loss aversion in decisions under risk have led to mixed results. Losses appear to loom larger than gains in some settings, but not in others. The current paper clarifies these results by highlighting...

Counterfactual thinking and regulatory fit

According to regulatory fit theory (Higgins, 2000), when people make decisions with strategies that sustain their regulatory focus orientation, they ``feel right'' about what they are doing, and this ``feeling-right'' ex...

Are maximizers really unhappy? The measurement of maximizing tendency

Recent research suggesting that people who maximize are less happy than those who satisfice has received considerable fanfare. The current study investigates whether this conclusion reflects the construct itself or rathe...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677690
  • DOI -
  • Views 137
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Daniel M. Oppenheimer and Benoit Monin (2009). The retrospective gambler’s fallacy: Unlikely events, constructing the past, and multiple universes. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(5), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677690