Income Equalization Does Not Confer Net Social Benefits

Journal Title: Ekonomia – Wroclaw Economic Review - Year 2016, Vol 22, Issue 4

Abstract

In the modern era, there is much wailing and gnashing of teeth about income and wealth disparities. The premise upon which these complaints are based is that egalitarianism is an unambiguous good, and that any and all steps would be taken to reduce gaps between the wealthy and the poor. The present paper is an attempt to right this imbalance; it makes the case that income and wealth differences should be neutral with regard to public policy: they should not be artificially increased or reduced. This view is defended on both economic and ethical grounds. On the economic side, the impossibility of interpersonal utility comparisons, the existence of loss aversion, questions about productivity responses to redistribution, and the undeniable reality of bureaucratic costs all call into question the wisdom of income redistribution. On the ethical side, a rights-based approach calls into question the egalitarian basis for income redistribution policies. In the end, income equality (or inequality) falls outside the realm of valid policy concerns.

Authors and Affiliations

Walter Block, Jonathan Lingenfelter, Lucas Lucas

Keywords

Related Articles

INSTYTUCJE I MECHANIZMY GOSPODAROWANIA

The subject of my reflections in this essay are institutions. As Mises famously claimed, all institutions, including the market economy, are designed by humans – as weak and fallible as they are – and are thus by defin...

Innovations in the practice of production and trade enterprises in EU countries

Modern theories are increasingly focusing on innovations. Scientific literature states that the implementation of innovations causes increase in sales volume: enterprises are improving the organization of production an...

„Gender directive” jako przykład regulacji na rynku ubezpieczeń życiowych w świetle austriackiej krytyki interwencjonizmu

Pod koniec 2012 r. weszły w życie nowe przepisy zakazujące ubezpieczycielom stosowania kryterium płci przy ustalaniu wysokości składek i świadczeń w ubezpieczeniach na życie. Wyrok Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europe...

Między monetaryzmem a gospodarką regulowaną. Wpływ światowego kryzysu na rynkach finansowych (2008–2009) na modernizację liberalnych teorii rozwoju gospodarczego

Kryzys na rynkach finansowych (2007-2011), określany często "bańką finansową", podważył ukształtowaną w drugiej połowie lat XX teorię monetaryzmu, której prekursorem był Milton Friedman. Sopadek tempa wzrostu...

Czym jest Bitcoin?

The aim of this paper is to answer the question of what – from an economic point of view – is Bitcoin. For this purpose, we make a literature review, discussing different views on the subject. Using the typology of mon...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP180690
  • DOI 10.19195/2084-4093.22.4.1
  • Views 82
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Walter Block, Jonathan Lingenfelter, Lucas Lucas (2016). Income Equalization Does Not Confer Net Social Benefits. Ekonomia – Wroclaw Economic Review, 22(4), 9-23. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-180690