Internet piracy as a rational choice

Abstract

According to expert estimation, 33% of informal sector of Ukrainian economy is shaped by piracy. Special 301 reports on copyright protection argue that Ukraine has serious problems with legal regulation of copyright protection. The U.S. federal government suspended the duty-free treatment of Ukrainian goods on December 22, 2017. The main cause of the act was inadequate copyright protection policy in Ukraine. This kind of policy provides favorable context for digital piracy, especially Internet piracy - using the Internet as a tool for illegal consumption of different types of goods (books, music etc.). The research paper deals with internet piracy in Ukraine. Following analysis is based on theory of rational choice with particular attention to the Becker model and James S. Coleman’s conception of micro-to-macro transitions. The principle of utility maximization is a core element of the theory. According to G. Becker, person becomes «criminal» (pirate, in this case) «not because their basic motivation is differ from that of other persons, but because their benefits and costs differ». The paper focuses on the case of pirate Telegram channel «The Book Depository in Ukrainian» (2035 followers). Pirates donated some money for one print copy of a book, bought it, after that they scanned it and made available in the channel for free. All followers of the channel who donated as well as who did not, got an access for the e-copy. The author explores socio-structural preconditions of internet piracy, negative externalities and provides optimal condition for normative regulation and penalty. From the economic point of view, the optimal regulatory strategy will stultify internet piracy. Negative externalities were calculated according to the «loss function» that was provided by G. Becker for crime (3. 946. 240 UAH). The existing regulatory strategy is not optimal. The formal model for optimal fine (/") is /”=(2*Y)*N, where Y - «income» of pirate after crime, N - number of pirates in the network. Here is corrected version of the research paper by the same title that was published in 2017. Please do not quote or cite previous version of the research paper.

Authors and Affiliations

В. А. Шелухін

Keywords

Related Articles

Methodological instruments for the study of problems of administrative and legal protection of defence of the state

The article deals with modern scientific views on problem issues in the methodology of legal science, the definition and application of methodological approaches and methods of scientific knowledge in the process of stud...

The concept of minimal state according to libertarian views of Robert Nozick.

This article analyzes the concept of minimal state elaborated by American scientist Robert Nozick in his book “Anarchy, State, Utopia”. The characteristics of libertarianism as a socio-political school were analyzed. The...

Migration issue in the political discourse of the modern Ukraine.

It’s explored migration issues and the concept of migration policy and strategy for its further development in the frame work of activities of the leading political parties of Ukraine. It’s explored the concept of furthe...

Legal regulation of financial control legal relationships

The financial control process is complex and diversified. Its essence is not revealed by one feature but characterized by their totality. At the present time there is no unambiguous approach to the definition of financia...

Quantitative and qualitative criteria of analysis of safety in personal life activity: a combination of statistical and sociological approaches

The process of ensuring safety of personality, like any other activity, requires compliance with organizational, legal, material and other conditions, in order to achieve goals. It makes very actual the development and...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP658191
  • DOI -
  • Views 89
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

В. А. Шелухін (2018). Internet piracy as a rational choice. Вісник Національного технічного університету України “Київський політехнічний інститут”. Політологія. Соціологія. Право., 3(), 50-58. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-658191