Internet piracy as a rational choice

Abstract

According to expert estimation, 33% of informal sector of Ukrainian economy is shaped by piracy. Special 301 reports on copyright protection argue that Ukraine has serious problems with legal regulation of copyright protection. The U.S. federal government suspended the duty-free treatment of Ukrainian goods on December 22, 2017. The main cause of the act was inadequate copyright protection policy in Ukraine. This kind of policy provides favorable context for digital piracy, especially Internet piracy - using the Internet as a tool for illegal consumption of different types of goods (books, music etc.). The research paper deals with internet piracy in Ukraine. Following analysis is based on theory of rational choice with particular attention to the Becker model and James S. Coleman’s conception of micro-to-macro transitions. The principle of utility maximization is a core element of the theory. According to G. Becker, person becomes «criminal» (pirate, in this case) «not because their basic motivation is differ from that of other persons, but because their benefits and costs differ». The paper focuses on the case of pirate Telegram channel «The Book Depository in Ukrainian» (2035 followers). Pirates donated some money for one print copy of a book, bought it, after that they scanned it and made available in the channel for free. All followers of the channel who donated as well as who did not, got an access for the e-copy. The author explores socio-structural preconditions of internet piracy, negative externalities and provides optimal condition for normative regulation and penalty. From the economic point of view, the optimal regulatory strategy will stultify internet piracy. Negative externalities were calculated according to the «loss function» that was provided by G. Becker for crime (3. 946. 240 UAH). The existing regulatory strategy is not optimal. The formal model for optimal fine (/") is /”=(2*Y)*N, where Y - «income» of pirate after crime, N - number of pirates in the network. Here is corrected version of the research paper by the same title that was published in 2017. Please do not quote or cite previous version of the research paper.

Authors and Affiliations

В. А. Шелухін

Keywords

Related Articles

Some issues of conflicts regulation of intercountry adoption

The institution of adoption has a long tradition, it is known in almost all legal systems. In the system of forms of placement of children left without parental care adoption is a priority. Adoption is a special legal...

Socio-cultural, political and economic transformation verbal-behavioral social engagement practices with the mentally ill

On the formation of verbal and behavioral practices of interaction with the mentally ill effect supranational, state and micro-social factors. Now Ukraine is experiencing a period of socio-cultural, political and economi...

Analysis of principles of administrative procedures in the approval of the civil society of Ukraine

This article examines the principles of administrative procedures that should be governed by the power of attorney when deciding on the termination of citizenship in Ukraine. The author also analyzed the concepts of prin...

About some signs of the objective side of military crimes

The article analyzes some features of the objective side of military crimes. Particular attention is paid to the way they are committed. Violation of the established order of carrying out military service is the basis of...

Universal codes in international political communication: specific case of audiovisual media

In both general humanitarian studies, as well as political studies, the concept of language has a large importance. However, considering any language could be stripped down to a (seemingly more basic) notion of code, act...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP658191
  • DOI -
  • Views 73
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

В. А. Шелухін (2018). Internet piracy as a rational choice. Вісник Національного технічного університету України “Київський політехнічний інститут”. Політологія. Соціологія. Право., 3(), 50-58. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-658191