Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2016, Vol 11, Issue 1

Abstract

Much research in cognitive psychology has focused on the tendency to conserve limited cognitive resources. The CRT is the predominant measure of such miserly information processing, and also predicts a number of frequently studied decision-making traits (such as belief bias and need for cognition). However, many subjects from common subject populations have already been exposed to the questions, which might add considerable noise to data. Moreover, the CRT has been shown to be confounded with numeracy. To increase the pool of available questions and to try to address numeracy confounds, we developed and tested the CRT-2. CRT-2 questions appear to rely less on numeracy than the original CRT but appear to measure closely related constructs in other respects. Crucially, substantially fewer subjects from Amazon’s Mechanical Turk have been previously exposed to CRT-2 questions. Though our primary purpose was investigating the CRT-2, we also found that belief bias questions appear suitable as an additional source of new items. Implications and remaining measurement challenges are discussed.

Authors and Affiliations

Keela S. Thomson and Daniel M. Oppenheimer

Keywords

Related Articles

Decision-making styles and their associations with decision-making competencies and mental health

This study investigates the psychometric characteristics of the General Decision-Making Scale (GDMS) on a sample of Slovak high-school and university students. Secondly, it addresses the relationship between decision-mak...

Reasons for cooperation and defection in real-world social dilemmas

Interventions to increase cooperation in social dilemmas depend on understanding decision makers’ motivations for cooperation or defection. We examined these in five real-world social dilemmas: situations where private i...

Age-related differences in adaptive decision making: Sensitivity to expected value in risky choice

While previous research has found that children make more risky decisions than their parents, little is known about the developmental trajectory for the ability to make advantageous decisions. In a sample of children, 5-...

Why are gainers more risk seeking

The phenomenon that prior gains may increase people’s willingness to accept risky gambles is named as the house money effect (Thaler and Johnson, 1990). Many studies have shown that the “house money effect” is a robust p...

A novel approach to studying strategic decisions with eye-tracking and machine learning

We propose a novel method of using eye-tracking to study strategic decisions. The conventional approach is to hypothesize what eye-patterns should be observed if a given model of decision-making was accurate, and then pr...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678229
  • DOI -
  • Views 162
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Keela S. Thomson and Daniel M. Oppenheimer (2016). Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test. Judgment and Decision Making, 11(1), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678229