IoT Community Technologies: Leaving Users to Their Own Devices or Orchestration of Engagement?

Journal Title: EAI Endorsed Transactions on Internet of Things - Year 2015, Vol 1, Issue 1

Abstract

Citizens are increasingly crowdfunding IoT based participatory sensing technologies that allow them to collect and share data about the environment. These initiatives are usually referred to as grassroots and are driven by a vision of widening access to tools for political action. In this paper we compare patterns of participation and user experience over 15 months in two distinct communities using ‘Smart Citizen’, a crowdfunded IoT participatory sensing tool. Our studies reveal that technology issues and a lack of reliability of the sensed data hindered user participation. However, in one of the communities, many of these challenges were overcome through orchestrated actions led by community champions. We discuss how crowdfunding doesn’t necessarily translate into active participation and provide guidelines on how to achieve sustained engagement in crowdfunded IoT community sensing projects: enable distributed orchestration provided by local champions, encourage social interactions that embed skills and learning, and facilitate meaningful participation and reward mechanisms among community members.

Authors and Affiliations

M. Balestrini, T. Diez, P. Marshall, A. Gluhak, Y. Rogers

Keywords

Related Articles

Innovative services for informing visually impaired persons in indoor environments

Movement and informing visually impaired persons is difficult because mobile application solutions and services are unable to work in indoors environments (location based service using GPS technology). Main precondition...

A Review on Cloud and Fog Computing Integration for IoT: Platforms Perspective

The fourth industrial revolution can connect ecosystems of more than 20 billion devices with an unpredictable gross of the local consumption. Connected devices will produce approximately 44 ZB of raw data by 2020, which...

BLE or IEEE 802.15.4: Which Home IoT Communication Solution is more Energy-Efficient?

IEEE 802.15.4 (used by Zigbee, 6LoWPAN and Thread) and Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) are two widely used wireless standards for ultra low power IoT (Internet of Things) technologies and smart home applications. In this arti...

Driver’s ECG Signal Detection and Transmission by Impulse-Radio-Based Human Body Communication Technology

In this study, we developed a wearable electrocardiogram (ECG) sensor with human body communication (HBC) tech- nology for vital data transmission in a car. The ECG signals were modulated with wideband pulse signals betw...

On mean waiting time completeness and equivalence of EDD and HOL-PJ dynamic priority in 2-class M/G/1 queue

This paper identifies two different parametrized dynamic priority queue disciplines, earliest due date (EDD) based and head of line priority jump (HOL-PJ), which are found to be mean waiting time complete in two class M/...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP46455
  • DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.26-10-2015.150601
  • Views 479
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

M. Balestrini, T. Diez, P. Marshall, A. Gluhak, Y. Rogers (2015). IoT Community Technologies: Leaving Users to Their Own Devices or Orchestration of Engagement?. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Internet of Things, 1(1), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-46455