“Isn’t everyone like me?”: On the presence of self-similarity in strategic interactions

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2016, Vol 11, Issue 1

Abstract

We propose that in strategic interactions a player is influenced by self-similarity. Self-similarity means that a player who chooses some action X tends to believe, to a greater extent than a player who chooses a different action, that other players will also choose action X. To demonstrate this phenomenon, we analyze the actions and the reported beliefs of players in a two-player two-action symmetric game. The game has the feature that for “materialistic” players, who wish to maximize their own payoff, there should be negative correlation between players’ actions and the beliefs that they assign to their opponent choosing the same action. We first elicit participants’ preferences over the outcomes of the game, and identify a large group of materialistic players. We then ask participants to choose an action in the game and report their beliefs. The reported beliefs of materialistic players are positively correlated with their actions, i.e., they are more likely to choose an action the stronger is their belief that their opponent will also choose the same action. We view this pattern as evidence for the presence of self-similarity.

Authors and Affiliations

Ariel Rubinstein and Yuval Salant

Keywords

Related Articles

How to make a risk seem riskier: The ratio bias versus construal level theory

Which statement conveys greater risk: “100 people die from cancer every day” or “36,500 people die from cancer every year”? In statistics where both frequencies and temporal information are used to convey risk, two theor...

The tide that lifts all focal boats: Asymmetric predictions of ascent and descent in rankings

In six studies, we find evidence for an upward mobility bias, or a tendency to predict that a rise in ranking is more likely than a decline, even in domains where motivation or intention to rise play no role. Although pe...

Charting the internal landscape: Affect associated with thoughts about major life domains explains life satisfaction

Studies of happiness have examined the impact of demographics, personality and emotions accompanying daily activities on life satisfaction. We suggest that how people feel while contemplating aspects of their lives, incl...

Actor/observer asymmetry in risky decision making

Are people willing to gamble more for themselves than what they deem reasonable for others? We addressed this question in a simplified computer gambling task in which subjects chose from a set of 10 cards. Subjects selec...

Children’s application of decision strategies in a compensatory environment

Adaptive actors must be able to use probabilities as decision weights. In a computerized multi-attribute task, the authors examined the decisions of children (5–6 years, n = 44; 9–10 y., n = 39) and adults (21–22 y., n =...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678235
  • DOI -
  • Views 137
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ariel Rubinstein and Yuval Salant (2016). “Isn’t everyone like me?”: On the presence of self-similarity in strategic interactions. Judgment and Decision Making, 11(1), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678235