Istota i formy ilościowych przekształceń przedmiotowych w polskim procesie cywilnym
Journal Title: Studia Iuridica - Year 2018, Vol 75, Issue
Abstract
The Polish Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) does regulate the amendments of the subject of claim in Art. 193. It must be observed that the Code (similar to the former Code of Civil Procedure of 1932) does not supply a statutory definition of the amendment of claim, leaving this matter to the theory of civil procedure; the regulation is only concerned with the admissibility of a change. Speaking in most general terms, an amendment of a claim is a procedural act which results in transformation of particular elements of the claim, thus directly influencing the proceedings. However, the continuity of the proceedings before and after the amendment must be preserved, in the sense that earlier procedural acts of the parties and evidence collected remain at least partially pertinent. The claimant’s act amending the claim may as well limit as extend the subject matter of the proceedings. It can also, obviously, contain as well an amendment of the requested remedy as the factual basis of the claim. A separate amendment of only one of those elements seems also possible. As a quantitative amendment of the claim must also be considered the introduction of a new claim besides the original one (a cumulative amendment). Such an amendment is expressly provided by Art. 193 § 2 CCP. It must be stressed that, as a matter of fact, the extension of the claim in a cumulative form, as regulated in Art. 193§ 2 CPC, shall produce the identical result as if the claimant already in the statement of claim availed of a possibility provided in Art. 191 CCP, namely to cumulate more than one substantive law claim in one statement of claim against the same respondent. The claimant’s procedural acts aimed at the quantitative amendment of the claim include also the limitation of the claim, thus resulting in the limitation of the subject matter of the proceedings. Undoubtedly, the limitation of the claim is a party’s procedural act bearing upon the court’s decision.<br/><br/>
Authors and Affiliations
Anna Wiśniewska
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP401851
- DOI 10.5604/01.3001.0012.6921
- Views 123
- Downloads 0
Zwolnienie z konstytucyjnego wymogu kontrasygnaty – rozważania na tle niekontrasygnowanych obwieszczeń Prezydenta Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej o wolnych stanowiskach sędziego w Sądzie Najwyższym i Naczelnym Sądzie Administracyjnym
On June 29, 2018 in Dziennik Urzędowy “Monitor Polski” (the Official Gazette of the Republic of Poland) were published two announcements by the President of the Republic of Poland – from May 24, 2018, on the vacant posit...
Glosa do postanowienia Naczelnego Sądu Administracyjnego z dnia 30 kwietnia 2015 r., I FZ 72/15. Przyznanie prawa pomocy w kontekście sytuacji materialnej podatnika
In connect judgement, the Supreme Administrative Court granted right, a taxable person who has been refused the right of assistance thus also possibility of defending their position on the complaints about the decision o...
Foreign Terrorist Fighters from the Perspective of Polish and European Criminal Law
Foreign terrorist fighters represent one of the powerful threats to the security of states and humanity in the 21st century. Besides participating in the actions of the Islamic State, they also pose a significant danger...
Przepadek w znowelizowanym kodeksie karnym
Under the Act of 20 February 2015 – changing the Penal Code and some other acts, from 1 July 2015 the forfeiture has been removed from the catalogue of penalties – the art. 39 point 4 of the Penal Code was repealed – and...
Znaczenie przesłanki „ciężkiego naruszenia podstawowych obowiązków” w rozwiązaniu stosunku pracy bez wypowiedzenia przez pracownika i pracodawcę
The article deals with the problem of understanding of the notion of “serious breach of basic obligations” which is a premise of termination of labour contract without notice both for employer and employee. Because the t...