Przepadek w znowelizowanym kodeksie karnym
Journal Title: Studia Iuridica - Year 2016, Vol 65, Issue
Abstract
Under the Act of 20 February 2015 – changing the Penal Code and some other acts, from 1 July 2015 the forfeiture has been removed from the catalogue of penalties – the art. 39 point 4 of the Penal Code was repealed – and also from the catalogue of security measures of an administrative nature – the wording of the art. 99 § 1 of the Penal Code has been changed, the art. 100 of the Penal Code has been repealed and its content has been transferred to the art. 49a of the Penal Code. Currently, the forfeiture is fully regulated in chapter Va of the Penal Code, entitled „Forfeiture and compensatory measures”. Changing the normative status of the forfeiture is not understood. I consider it as a mistake. This change was not associated with changes of the normative status of forfeiture in the Fiscal Penal Code and Code of Offences. Besides the changes concerning the status of the forfeiture which has obviously system nature under the amendment came to repeal the provisions of articles 44 § 8, 45 § 6 and art. 45 § 4 of the Penal Code. These were changes of organizational character. They were accompanied by changes in the provisions of the Executive Penal Code and Code of Criminal Procedure, which took over the content of the repealed provisions of the Penal Code. The wording of the art. 45 § 3 of the Penal Code regulating one of the legal presumptions relating to the forfeiture of financial benefits has been changed. This has increased the warranty standard of that provision.<br/><br/>
Authors and Affiliations
Magdalena Błaszczyk
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP188991
- DOI -
- Views 88
- Downloads 0
Odpowiedzialność odszkodowawcza w ramach ujemnego interesu umowy
This article is discussing certain issues concerning the liability within the reliance interest under modern Polish civil law having as a background and a starting point Prof. Czachórski’s considerations over the idea of...
The Concept of a Special Criminal Law as a Weapon Against “Enemies” of the Society
In Günther Jakobs’ terminology the term “Feindstrafecht” (enemy criminal law) means a special criminal law designed to fight enemies of society. Unlike traditional criminal law, it is not aimed at regular citizens but at...
Ograniczenie swobody wypowiedzi komercyjnej w odniesieniu do oznakowania napojów alkoholowych
The article regards restriction on commercial speech concerning labelling of the alcoholic beverages. The commercial speech arising from both domestic law and international law is not absolute and may be subject of the s...
The “Ignored Challenge”, Urban Sprawl and its Negative Impacts in Poland: A Comparison between the EU and U.S.
Nieład urbanizacyjny to ważki problem w Polsce i Unii Europejskiej, a także w USA. Niniejszy artykuł analizuje koncepcje nieładu urbanizacyjnego, jego motywy i negatywne efekty środowiskowe, socjalne i ekonomiczne w kont...
Trust and solidarity at a time of transformation. The problem of so-called Bug River property claims in the case law of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal and the European Court of Human Rights
The article deals with the issue of the Zabużanie people’s claims. The Zabużanie people were persons who lost their assets as a result of relocation from the Eastern Borderlands (also known as Kresy) of the Second Republ...