It’s still bullshit: Reply to Dalton (2016)

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2016, Vol 11, Issue 1

Abstract

In reply to Dalton (2016), we argue that bullshit is defined in terms of how it is produced, not how it is interpreted. We agree that it can be interpreted as profound by some readers (and assumed as much in the original paper). Nonetheless, we present additional evidence against the possibility that more reflective thinkers are more inclined to interpret bullshit statements as profound.

Authors and Affiliations

Gordon Pennycook, James Allan Cheyne, Nathaniel Barr, Derek J. Koehler and Jonathan A. Fugelsang

Keywords

Related Articles

The gambler’s fallacy in retrospect: A supplementary comment on Oppenheimer and Monin (2009)

Oppenheimer and Monin (2009) recently found that subjectively rare events are taken to indicate a longer preceding sequence of unobserved trials than subjectively common events, an effect which they refer to as the retro...

Valuing bets and hedges

Two studies replicate the anomaly identified by Frederick, Meyer and Levis (2015) and Frederick, Levis, Malliaris and Meyer (2018). People show typical risk averse behavior by valuing risk below the focal lottery’s expec...

Winning a battle but losing the war: On the drawbacks of using the anchoring tactic in distributive negotiations

In two experiments, we explored the possible drawbacks of applying the anchoring tactic in a negotiation context. In Study 1, buyers who used the anchoring tactic made higher profits, but their counterparts thought their...

“Isn’t everyone like me?”: On the presence of self-similarity in strategic interactions

We propose that in strategic interactions a player is influenced by self-similarity. Self-similarity means that a player who chooses some action X tends to believe, to a greater extent than a player who chooses a differe...

“Am I going to be happy and financially stable?”: How American women feel when they think about financial security

Before the recent recession evoked general dismay and uncertainty, this study examined the relative contribution of income and the concern over financial security to life satisfaction. The degree to which such concerns p...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678232
  • DOI -
  • Views 101
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Gordon Pennycook, James Allan Cheyne, Nathaniel Barr, Derek J. Koehler and Jonathan A. Fugelsang (2016). It’s still bullshit: Reply to Dalton (2016). Judgment and Decision Making, 11(1), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678232