Judging competing theoretical accounts by their empirical content and parsimony: Reply to Myrseth and Wollbrant (2015)

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2015, Vol 10, Issue 2

Abstract

Myrseth and Wollbrant (2015) offer an alternative theoretical explanation for our finding that defection entails more cognitive conflict than cooperation (Kieslich & Hilbig, 2014). Although we completely agree that different theoretical explanations for a result are possible, we maintain that the theoretical approach we tested (Rand et al., 2014) is parsimonious and falsifiable, excluding certain plausible results a priori. By comparison, the alternative framework proposed by Myrseth and Wollbrant requires several debatable assumptions to account for our findings, rendering it the more complex theory. Besides, their framework as a whole could have accounted for any possible finding in our experiment, making it impossible to falsify it with our data. We thus conclude that the notion by Rand et al.—that there is a spontaneous disposition to cooperate—has more empirical content while requiring fewer assumptions.

Authors and Affiliations

Pascal J. Kieslich and Benjamin E. Hilbig

Keywords

Related Articles

Cognitive determinants of affective forecasting errors

Often to the detriment of human decision making, people are prone to an impact bias when making affective forecasts, overestimating the emotional consequences of future events. The cognitive processes underlying the impa...

Deliberation versus automaticity in decision making: Which presentation format features facilitate automatic decision making?

The idea of automatic decision making approximating normatively optimal decisions without necessitating much cognitive effort is intriguing. Whereas recent findings support the notion that such fast, automatic processes...

Error Parsing: An alternative method of implementing social judgment theory

We present a novel method of judgment analysis called Error Parsing, based upon an alternative method of implementing Social Judgment Theory (SJT). SJT and Error Parsing both posit the same three components of error in h...

An attempt to clarify the link between cognitive style and political ideology: A non-western replication and extension

Previous studies relating low-effort or intuitive thinking to political conservatism are limited to Western cultures. Using Turkish and predominantly Muslim samples, Study 1 found that analytic cognitive style (ACS) is n...

Affect, risk perception and future optimism after the tsunami disaster

Environmental events such as natural disasters may influence the public's affective reactions and decisions. Shortly after the 2004 Tsunami disaster we assessed how affect elicited by thinking about this disaster influen...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678181
  • DOI -
  • Views 126
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Pascal J. Kieslich and Benjamin E. Hilbig (2015). Judging competing theoretical accounts by their empirical content and parsimony: Reply to Myrseth and Wollbrant (2015). Judgment and Decision Making, 10(2), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678181