JUDICIAL BIOETHICS IN ITALY: CRITICAL NOTES ON A RECENT JUDGMENT CONCERNING PROTECTION OF PRENATAL LIFE

Journal Title: Ius Humani. Revista de Derecho - Year 2014, Vol 4, Issue 2

Abstract

Inspired by a recent judgment of the Italian Court of Cassation, this paper presents a summary of the essential references of fact and law around the case, and offers some critical reflections on the topic, very conflictive, of the legal personality of the unborn. The reasoning inevitably turns toward the more general discourse concerning the foundation of individual rights, oscillating between liberty (voluntaristic and subjectivist outlook) and dignity (objectivist, and conditioned by the precautionary principle). On the basis of the preferred option, we will have a different conception of the role of biolaw in technologically advanced societies. After the presentation of the judicial case and the main legal arguments of the decision (first chapter), the article explores the crucial issue of legal personality of the unborn, from the dual perspective of law and philosophy of law, in particular justifying the equation that identifies human being and person (second chapter). Subsequently, the third chapter offers a reflection on the alternative between dignity and liberty in order to the foundation of individual rights, arguing the preference for a dignitary perspective: in fact, this defends better the vulnerable people and then really safeguards the equality. The last chapter before the conclusion connects the bioethical discussion with the consideration of task of biolaw and of the jurist in contemporary societies.

Authors and Affiliations

Claudio Sartea

Keywords

Related Articles

THE CARD IDENTITY NUMBER ROLE IN THE RIGHT TO IDENTITY

Among the rights enshrined in our Constitution is the right to personal identity, which is also considered a human right and inalienable of every person since birth. Under the guideline of this right, the article present...

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND FUNDAMENTAL SOCIAL RIGHTS

The aim of this work is to show that the administrative law of a social and democratic state based on the rule of law is the right that the government has to liberty in solidarity. The method used is specific of legal re...

REGISTRY OFFICE AND SECULARIZATION. A COMPARISON BETWEEN ECUADOR AND FRANCE

The study of the creation of the Registry Office of people and of its linkages with the Church’s sacraments gets us right to the heart of legal, political and religious paramount issues. The comparison of recent French a...

RAZÓN Y DEMOCRACIA: LA POTENCIAL RENOVACIÓN DEL CONCEPTO DE ARISTOCRACIA

This article studies the relationship between different kinds of discussion and the roles that they play in the diverse institutions of modern representative democracy. It distinguishes between three kinds of discussion:...

NEGATIVE AND POSITIVE NEO-CONSTITUTIONALISM

The term “neoconstitucionalism” is quite ambiguous: contemporary culture uses it to denote such as heterogeneous things as a form of state, a policy of judicial activism, a theoretical account of contemporary legal syste...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP36067
  • DOI https://doi.org/10.31207/ih.v4i0.49
  • Views 403
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Claudio Sartea (2014). JUDICIAL BIOETHICS IN ITALY: CRITICAL NOTES ON A RECENT JUDGMENT CONCERNING PROTECTION OF PRENATAL LIFE. Ius Humani. Revista de Derecho, 4(2), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-36067