Law on Higher Education and Science of the Republic of Armenia
Journal Title: Journal of Advanced Research in Social Sciences - Year 2024, Vol 7, Issue 1
Abstract
In 1991, the Soviet model of higher education in 15 republics of the USSR, with its 5.1 million students and 946 higher education institutions, started 15 independent journeys. All countries within the Soviet heritage, shared the legacies of the single Soviet approach to higher education provision: a centrally planned organization and financing, subordination to multiple sectoral ministries, a national curriculum, a vocational orientation based on the combination of strong basic education and narrow specialized job-related training, a nomenclature of types of higher education institutions, tuition-free study places and guaranteed employment upon graduation combined with mandatory job placement. After 70 years of Soviet legacy, back in 1991 Armenia initiated its independent journey. The Law on Higher and Postgraduate Education of the Republic of Armenia (RA) entered into force on April 14, 1999 and since then has undergone a number of amendments. Back in 2019 a new draft Law on Higher Education and Science was published on the Unified Website for Publication of Legal Actsâ Drafts, inviting public discussions from 03.12.2019 till 18.12.2019. Throughout two decades this was the first time when major and fundamental amendments were foreseen in the existing law on Higher and Postgraduate Education and the Law on Scientific and Scientific-Technical operations; at least this is what has been announced by the Ministry of Education, Science, Culture and Sport (MoESCS). However, the reality is that after long- lasting public discussions, debates and a lot of time spent on final version of the document, on August 2, 2021, the Constitutional Court declared the law âOn Higher Education and Scienceâ unconstitutional. This paper aims to analyze the reasons behind the proposed amendments to existing laws and the negative reception of the draft law. Specifically, it focuses on the Draft Law on Higher Education and Science, examining the historical, social, and political factors that may have influenced the agenda-setting process. Additionally, the paper employs a critical policy discourse analysis framework, with a particular emphasis on contextualization, to study the agenda-setting process.
Authors and Affiliations
Zaruhi Soghomonyan,
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP743635
- DOI https://doi.org/10.33422/jarss.v7i1.1183
- Views 23
- Downloads 0
The Effect of Thailand’s Subcultures on Other Southeast Asia States’ Countercultures
Southeast Asia (SEA) is geographically divided into two sub-regions, mainland and insular. This region consists of 11 states that consistently oppose social liberal changes and uphold traditional values. Conservatism in...
The Dynamics of Cultural Writing in Postmodernity
The article investigates the upheaval generated by the change of epistemes, from modernity to postmodernity (structuralism to poststructuralism) at the level where it is not only self-assumed, but also stated: at the wri...
Globalization and the Cultural/Creative Industries: An Assessment of Nigeria’s Position in the Global Space
This study provides an assessment of globalization and its impact on top performing creative industries in Nigeria. The prospects and contributions of the Nigerian film, music and fashion industries to the Gross Domestic...
Building meaningful brands through disseminating artificial intelligence-related content. An essay about cancer hospitals
Artificial intelligence (AI) allows cancer hospitals to accelerate their digital transformation and promote their brand. This essay aims to answer the following research question: which communication principles should ca...
Challenges of Access and Affordability Women Elderly Health Issues
The gendered nature of aging reveals that women tend to live longer than men. Gender relations structure the entire life cycle, from birth to old age, influencing access to resources and opportunities and shaping life ch...