Learning to communicate risk information in groups

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2008, Vol 3, Issue 8

Abstract

Despite vigorous research on risk communication, little is known about the social forces that drive these choices. Erev, Wallsten, & Neal (1991) showed that forecasters learn to select verbal or numerical probability estimates as a function of which mode yields on average the larger group payoffs. We extend the result by investigating the effect of group size on the speed with which forecasters converge on the better communication mode. On the basis of social facilitation theory we hypothesized that small groups induce less arousal and anxiety among their members than do large groups when performing new tasks, and therefore that forecasters in small groups will learn the better communication mode more quickly. This result obtained in Experiment 1, which compared groups of size 3 to groups of size 5 or 6. To test whether social loafing rather than social facilitation was mediating the effects, Experiment 2 compared social to personal feedback holding group size constant at 3 members. Learning was faster in the personal feedback condition, suggesting that social facilitation rather than loafing underlay the results.

Authors and Affiliations

Hsuchi Ting and Thomas S. Wallsten

Keywords

Related Articles

In the “I” of the storm: Shared initials increase disaster donations

People prefer their own initials to other letters, influencing preferences in many domains. The “name letter effect” (Nuttin, 1987) may not apply to negatively valenced targets if people are motivated to downplay or dist...

A Criticism of Doyle’s survey of time preference: A correction regarding the CRDI and CADI families

Doyle’s (2013) theoretical survey of discount functions criticizes two parametric families abbreviated as CRDI and CADI families. We show that Doyle’s criticisms are based on a mathematical mistake and are incorrect.

Trust in motives, trust in competence: Separate factors determining the effectiveness of risk communication

According to Siegrist, Earle and Gutscher’s (2003) model of risk communication, the effect of advice about risk on an agent’s behavior depends on the agent’s trust in the competence of the advisor and on their trust in t...

From foe to friend and back again: The temporal dynamics of intra-party bias in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election

Political identification is the basis of enduring conflict, suggesting that political attitudes are difficult to change. Here we show that in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election, political identities underwent modificati...

Divergence between individual perceptions and objective indicators of tail risks: Evidence from floodplain residents in New York City

This study provides the first comprehensive analysis of individual perceptions of tail risks. It focuses not only on the probability, as has been studied by Nicholas Barberis and others, but also on anticipation of damag...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677842
  • DOI -
  • Views 152
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Hsuchi Ting and Thomas S. Wallsten (2008). Learning to communicate risk information in groups. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(8), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677842