Learning to communicate risk information in groups
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2008, Vol 3, Issue 8
Abstract
Despite vigorous research on risk communication, little is known about the social forces that drive these choices. Erev, Wallsten, & Neal (1991) showed that forecasters learn to select verbal or numerical probability estimates as a function of which mode yields on average the larger group payoffs. We extend the result by investigating the effect of group size on the speed with which forecasters converge on the better communication mode. On the basis of social facilitation theory we hypothesized that small groups induce less arousal and anxiety among their members than do large groups when performing new tasks, and therefore that forecasters in small groups will learn the better communication mode more quickly. This result obtained in Experiment 1, which compared groups of size 3 to groups of size 5 or 6. To test whether social loafing rather than social facilitation was mediating the effects, Experiment 2 compared social to personal feedback holding group size constant at 3 members. Learning was faster in the personal feedback condition, suggesting that social facilitation rather than loafing underlay the results.
Authors and Affiliations
Hsuchi Ting and Thomas S. Wallsten
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP677842
- DOI -
- Views 151
- Downloads 0
Do you look forward to retirement? Motivational biases in pension decisions
This research examines the relationship between positive and negative perceptions of pensions and motivation to engage in the decision process of choosing a private pension plan, as well as satisfaction from the chosen p...
Information search in everyday decisions: The generalizability of the attraction search effect
The recently proposed integrated coherence-based decisions and search model (iCodes) makes predictions for search behavior in multi-attribute decision tasks beyond those of classic decision-making heuristics. More precis...
Who says "larger" and who says "smaller"? Individual differences in the language of comparison
When comparing a pair of attribute values, English speakers can use a "larger" comparative ("A is larger/longer/higher/more than B") or a "smaller" comparative ("B is smaller/shorter/lower/less than A"). This choice matt...
Cognitive reflection predicts the acceptance of unfair ultimatum game offers
In the ultimatum game, one player proposes a split of money between him- or herself and another player, who can accept the offer (and both players keep the allocated money) or reject the offer (and both players get nothi...
Challenging some common beliefs: Empirical work within the adaptive toolbox metaphor
The authors review their own empirical work inspired by the adaptive toolbox metaphor. The review examines factors influencing strategy selection and execution in multi-attribute inference tasks (e.g., information costs,...