Legal Sanction for Non-observance of Expediency in Power of Attorney
Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2015, Vol 47, Issue 100
Abstract
Power of attorney (PA) contract is among the specified contracts that are widely used in society and people’s legal relations, because on one hand, people are not compelled to directly vindicate their rights and, on the other hand, the above-mentioned contract is of high importance in lawsuits and restoring the victim’s rights in courts of law. Through signing contract of PA, the attorney and the client reciprocate obligation and right and hold judicial relations and mutual commitments and responsibilities. Among these commitments is the observance of the client’s expediency. Since this commitment overshadows other commitments of the attorney and is somehow regarded as the foundation of all his commitments, it is of special importance. Despite the assertion on the above-mentioned commitment in article 667 of the civil law, the legal sanction for its violation in various obligations is ambiguous. Silence of the law, weakness of the writings, and being involved in this issue has made us search for an answer whose summary is as follows: the legal actions that have been carried out without observing the client’s expediency is regarded as effective – except for the obligation in which the client has connived with the party of contract – although, in case of availability of options, the clients can remove loss from themselves.
Authors and Affiliations
Bizhan Haji Azizi, Sayyideh Maryam Etemad
Interaction of Value and Reality in Creating Legal Rule
Fundamentals of legal rule is one of the major discourses of the philosophy of law, which has led to the formation of numerous intellectual schools in this field. The main query of the present research is that whether th...
Criticism of the basis of legal sentence for participation in homicide in Islamic Penal Code
The main question of the article is whether tens, hundreds or large numbers of people participating in the killing of an individual can be punished in retaliation? Is this sentence compatible with the spirit of Islam and...
An Exploration into the Criterion for Dividing the Jurists into Akhbārī and Uṣūlī
Dividing the jurists into akhbārī (traditionist) and uṣūlī (legal theorist) is the most important division that dichotomizes the Imāmī jurists into two groups. In jurisprudential and legal (uṣūlī) books, there are many i...
An investigation into the effect of presuppositions in understanding and the ways to control them from the perspective of philosophical hermeneutics and Islamic sciences
Achieving a good or desirable understanding is one of the concerns for every nterpreter or theory of interpretation. One of the issues seen as a major obstacle in achieving such an understanding is the interference of pr...
An Inquiry into the Issue of "Prohibition of Lahw" as a Jurisprudential Rule
This article is a research concerning the issue of lahw (vain pursuits) from the jurisprudential point of view to answer the question as to whether it is possible to prove the prohibition of lahw as a jurisprudential rul...