Criticism of the basis of legal sentence for participation in homicide in Islamic Penal Code
Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2015, Vol 47, Issue 101
Abstract
The main question of the article is whether tens, hundreds or large numbers of people participating in the killing of an individual can be punished in retaliation? Is this sentence compatible with the spirit of Islam and its policy of criminal justice, or with the minimalistic interpretation in favor of the accused? The author hypothesizes and claims that the permission to retaliation against a community of people having participated in the homicide of an individual is inconsistent with the justice-seeking spirit of Islamic Penal Code; moreover, it is unjustified and at least ambivalent and open to doubts based on our understanding of an important and fundamental Qur’anic verse, 33 of Surah Isra (17:33). More importantly, a detailed evaluation of the provisions of conflicting but relevant narratives as well as the language of the verses of qişāş reveals that the sentence to retribution against more than one of the participants in a homicide (without specification) and also available to the choice of the victim’s heir is a clear example of the need to enforce the rule ‘ward off the hudūd by suspicion.’ Hence, the punishment of an individual among the community of participants in an act of homicide especially on the basis of the heirs’ choice and calculated by subtracting the blood money (with that diya being an independent punishment itself) seems to fulfill justice, retribution and the balance (similarity) between crime and punishment much greater than killing all participants for the murder of one person. It would be sufficient to notice the importance of research into this problem in light of the caution urged when it comes to questions of blood and honor: the more critique is made about those issues, the more consistent and closer to the truth become the sentences and rulings surrounding them. The present article aims to apply descriptive-analytic tools in order to criticize the very basis of the criminal sentence against participation in homicide.
Authors and Affiliations
Amir Hamzeh S alarzaee
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP190129
- DOI 10.22067/fiqh.v47i21.28829
- Views 138
- Downloads 0
Enumeration of Legal Punishments Crimes in Imāmiyya Criminal Law: Causes for Multiplicity of Opinions and the Necessity of Reckoning (Iḥsā’)
Studying the nature of legal punishments (ḥudūd) and legal misdemeanors deserving these kinds of punishment – which along with discretionary punishments (ta‘zīrāt) are regarded as the most important criminal reactions to...
A new Attitude in Criticism of the Validity of Reliable Tradition
One of the most important discourses on basics of jurisprudence methodology (‘ilm al-uṣūl) is the one concerning the isolated tradition. The most important reason for proving the validity of the isolated tradition accord...
A Legal Deliberation on Article 63 of Islamic Penal Law and the Clause 1 to Article 1-221 of the Suggested Bill
Article 63 of Islamic penal law defines adultery as: “copulation of a man with a woman who is essentially unlawful (ḥarām) to him, although in dubur (back), in cases other than misapprehended consummation.” Clause 1 of a...
A Glance at the Impact of Invalid Conditions on a Contract
Although the corrupted condition is not protected by sanctions, there are three beliefs as to whether its corruption (fasād) permeates the contract (‘aqd) or not: theory of fasād, theory of non-permeation of fasād, theor...
Criticism of the basis of legal sentence for participation in homicide in Islamic Penal Code
The main question of the article is whether tens, hundreds or large numbers of people participating in the killing of an individual can be punished in retaliation? Is this sentence compatible with the spirit of Islam and...