Criticism of the basis of legal sentence for participation in homicide in Islamic Penal Code
Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2015, Vol 47, Issue 101
Abstract
The main question of the article is whether tens, hundreds or large numbers of people participating in the killing of an individual can be punished in retaliation? Is this sentence compatible with the spirit of Islam and its policy of criminal justice, or with the minimalistic interpretation in favor of the accused? The author hypothesizes and claims that the permission to retaliation against a community of people having participated in the homicide of an individual is inconsistent with the justice-seeking spirit of Islamic Penal Code; moreover, it is unjustified and at least ambivalent and open to doubts based on our understanding of an important and fundamental Qur’anic verse, 33 of Surah Isra (17:33). More importantly, a detailed evaluation of the provisions of conflicting but relevant narratives as well as the language of the verses of qişāş reveals that the sentence to retribution against more than one of the participants in a homicide (without specification) and also available to the choice of the victim’s heir is a clear example of the need to enforce the rule ‘ward off the hudūd by suspicion.’ Hence, the punishment of an individual among the community of participants in an act of homicide especially on the basis of the heirs’ choice and calculated by subtracting the blood money (with that diya being an independent punishment itself) seems to fulfill justice, retribution and the balance (similarity) between crime and punishment much greater than killing all participants for the murder of one person. It would be sufficient to notice the importance of research into this problem in light of the caution urged when it comes to questions of blood and honor: the more critique is made about those issues, the more consistent and closer to the truth become the sentences and rulings surrounding them. The present article aims to apply descriptive-analytic tools in order to criticize the very basis of the criminal sentence against participation in homicide.
Authors and Affiliations
Amir Hamzeh S alarzaee
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP190129
- DOI 10.22067/fiqh.v47i21.28829
- Views 99
- Downloads 0
Critique of the Authenticity of the Evidences on Couple’s Deprivation from the Right to Qiṣāṣ in Jurisprudential Texts and Statutes
Right to qiṣāṣ belongs to the heirs of the deceased, that is to those who are regarded as the legal heir of the murdered and the principle is: “Whoever inherits the property of the deceased, inherits the right to qiṣāṣ,...
A Deliberation on Punishment for Pederasty: Legal-Judicial Analysis of Article 110 of Iranian Civil Law
Despite the challenges noticed in the meaning and concept of pederasty (lawāṭ), different viewpoints have always existed among the jurists concerning the punishment of the pederast, to the extent that some jurists have d...
An Inquiry into the Legal-Theological Rule of "Non-Reprimand and Unaccountability of a Person Versus another Person’s Action”
One of the significant legal-theological rule, which has drawn little attention in legal texts, is the rule of “not reprimanding a person for another person’s sin and the unaccountability of the person for other people’s...
The evolution of Khul’ divorce theory in Shiite jurisprudence
This article aims, with a detailed insight into the historical process of Khul’ divorce in two phases in Arabia before Islam and after Islam, to discover the creation of successive theories and the evolution of ‘the Khul...
Mutability of Protective Covenant (dhamma) with the Birth of Modern Citizenship Rights
The Islamic legal system established an institution based on which the followers of the triple religions, that is, Judaism, Christianity and Zoroastrianism, under the condition of accepting an agreement entitled as “dham...