Legality and objectives of the decisions of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine at the time of delegation to the competition of the Supreme Court

Journal Title: Правова позиція - Year 2018, Vol 2, Issue

Abstract

The scientific article is devoted to the clarification of the legality and validity of the decisions of the High Qualifications Commission of Judges of Ukraine during admission to the Supreme Court. The Laws of Ukraine “On Judicial System and Status of Judges”, “On Higher Education”, as well as the decision of the High Qualifications Commission of Judges of Ukraine, for example, № 148 / S-18 of October 16, 2018, are analyzed. It is substantiated that the experience of scientific work is the professional activity of a person in a specialty after obtaining higher legal education in the positions of scientific (scientific and pedagogical) workers at a higher educational institution (university, academy or institute, except higher military educational institutions) or a scientific institution of Ukraine or a similar a higher educational establishment or a scientific institution of a foreign state. It is proved that the incorrect application of the Laws of Ukraine “On the Judicial System and the Status of Judges”, “On Higher Education” in the decisions of the High Qualifications Commission of Judges, which leads to: a) violation of Article 19 of the Constitution of Ukraine, according to which the bodies of state power and bodies of local self- their officials are obliged to act only on the basis, within the limits of authority and in the manner provided by the Constitution and laws of Ukraine; b) violation of the principles of the work of the High Qualifications Commission of Judges, such as the rule of law, legality, authenticity, validity of decisions pecified in the regulations of the High Qualifications Commission of Judges; c) appeals against the decisions of the High Qualifications Commission of Judges both in domestic courts and in the European Court of Human Rights; d) causes irreparable damage to the international reputation of Ukraine, especially in the context of European integration processes in our country.

Authors and Affiliations

Є. О. Легеза

Keywords

Related Articles

Grounds for establishing probationary period of civil servants during the civil service: doctrinal interpretation of applicable law

The article deals with the issue of the soundness of the trial period for state employees during a promotion in state service in part relevancy actions of management of public administration management for its determinin...

Is the fact of detention of the suspect a proof in the criminal process?

This article covers the real purpose of detention of a person suspected of committing a crime. Among the transformations that the domestic legal doctrine on the path to European integration has undergone in recent years,...

Legal and organizational principles of customs policy US

This article is devoted to scientific analysis of the legal and institutional framework of customs policy leader of the international community  the United States, which is a model for Ukraine, which aspires to join the...

Mediation as an alternative (extrajudicial) way of resolving a tax dispute in Ukraine: posing the problem

The article deals with the modern model of resolving tax disputes in Ukraine. The author gives an assessment of the legal regulation of the issue, taking into account the nature of the dispute and the subject, the ground...

The principle of the rule of law in the system of principles of administrative and legal support integrity judges

The article is devoted to the analysis of the essence of the principle of the rule of law and its significance for the system of principles of administrative and legal support for the integrity of judges. The author note...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP600812
  • DOI -
  • Views 47
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Є. О. Легеза (2018). Legality and objectives of the decisions of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine at the time of delegation to the competition of the Supreme Court. Правова позиція, 2(), 152-156. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-600812