Limitations of the right to free movement in the enforcement procedure (II)
Journal Title: Revista Institutului Național al Justiției - Year 2017, Vol 40, Issue 1
Abstract
This investigation is based on the problem whether by applying the prohibition to leave the country towards the debtor it is defied or not freedom of movement. For this purpose, it was analyzed the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, the Court of Justice of the European Union and the Constitutional Court of Moldova. Therefore, it can be noted that according to European Court of Human Rights jurisprudence, it is recognized that the prohibition of leaving the country may be applied to a debtor in accordance with Article 2 of Protocol 4 of the European Convention on Human Rights as long as it is justified and only for the period that serves to ensure recovery of the debt. Per a contrario, the jurisprudence of the EU Court of Justice pleads for inadmissibility of restriction on the right to free movement within the European Union for consideration that person has a debt to the state or to individuals (natural and/or legal entities). In turn, the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova joined the position of the European Court of Human Rights in the matter investigated, establishing that the prohibition of leaving the country is not an unjustified interference with freedom of movement, guaranteed by the Constitution and the international acts. Finally, the article is focused on another measure of ensuring the execution of the enforcement document able to undermine the right to free movement, namely: the ban on issuance of identity documents.
Authors and Affiliations
Dumitru Visternicean, Gheorghe Reniță
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP193120
- DOI -
- Views 109
- Downloads 0
The dimension of the principle of subsidiarityin the international law of human rights
The definition of the principle of subsidiarity results in the development of two interdependent meanings. In the negative sense, the subsidiarity requires larger social units, such as the state, to refrain from any acti...
International legal framework of freedom of thought
Freedom of thought is a fundamental right enshrined in many universal and regional instruments on the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. Relatively recently appeared this right, due to codification, has...
THE ISSUE OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PREAMBLE TO THE ARMENIAN CONSTITUTION: FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE
The article considers the issues of axiological characteristics of constitutional preambles and possibilities of their amendment. The author concludes that the constitutional preamble, besides the declaratory significanc...
The admisibility criteria to the european court of human rights (1)
European Court of Human Rights is a chance to be heard, especially for people who consider themselves wronged in their rights by a national court. Addressing the Court is usually done by filing an appeal against a judgme...
Modern means of summoning in civil proceedings, current state and development perspectives
Summoning is a predominantly technical and mechanical process, which does not involve direct implication of the participants in the process, being an act exclusively performed by the court. Therewith, summoning is one of...