Logic, Reasoning, Decision-Making

Journal Title: Future Human Image - Year 2018, Vol 10, Issue

Abstract

The author focuses the main attention on the people’s everyday reasoning and its mechanism developing the idea that the human mind influenced by the bounded rationality does not always use the logical tools to make a decision. More precisely, the author is talking about the deductive reasoning cherished by Aristotle and its place in real-life reasoning. The main questions raised in this paper are: (1) Does Aristotelian syllogism work for real life? (2) Are we the rational creatures with the “computer mind”? (3) What differs us from the Artificial Intelligence in the decision-making process? Comparing the processing work of a computer program, especially the Artificial Intelligence, with the everyday reasoning of the human mind, the author comes to the conclusion that Aristotelian logic has a more significant impact on the development of the AI than on human thinking. One of the main reasons is that the machines, no matter how advanced they are, are free from the external influences. They use the program put in their mainboard without “thinking” of the outcomes. They do not care if the results of their calculations or actions hurt someone. For example, those new autonomous cars with the movement detectors enable the driver to sleep during the trip, because the machine is driving for you, steering wheel angle, checking the road conditions and correcting the path itself. At the same time, it will not think of your body position and will you be hurt or not in case of the abrupt stop when the child appears in front of the car. It does as it was programed (or how it had learn) to do. While human can use different tools to reach their goal and make the decisions in real life. People do not stay rational all the time and, unlike the machines, can use intuition or do some moves without thinking just by force of habit. These unconscious forces can both help and hurt human decisions.

Authors and Affiliations

Nataliia Reva

Keywords

Related Articles

Educational Cognitive Technologies as Human Adaptation Strategies

Modernity is characterized by profound changes in all spheres of human life caused by the global transformations on macro and micro levels of social reality. These changes allow us to speak about the present as the era o...

Theoretical and Methodological Principles of Formation of the Spiritual Values of Students in the Conditions of Higher Education Institution

The paper is devoted to the existing problems within the process of spiritual values formation which is essential for the students of a higher education institution. The author gives a definition of the term “spiritual v...

Key Aspects of Explication of Thinking in the Sergii Krymskyi’s Legacy of the Soviet Period

The article is devoted to the problem of thinking, which is one of the key issues of Sergii Krymskyi`s legacy. The paper observes the analysis of the Soviet scientific legacy of the thinker conducted in the field of hist...

Philosophy of Education: Main Methodological Vectors of Moulding the Person of the Future in Higher Education

The paper discusses the main methodological vectors of the world outlook moulding of the person of the future in higher school required with time and defined with the state of the modern higher education in Ukraine, exte...

Family Policy of the State as a Response to Social Security Threats

Today, national security is widely understood, and its definition goes beyond the absence of military action. The broad sense of security includes not only a lack of risk or a direct threat to war, but also a sense of se...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP414766
  • DOI 10.29202/fhi/10/8
  • Views 147
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Nataliia Reva (2018). Logic, Reasoning, Decision-Making. Future Human Image, 10(), 76-84. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-414766